From: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@amd.com>
To: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
chao.gao@intel.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,
yan.y.zhao@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: kvm-coco-queue: Support protected TSC
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:17:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4df36dc-9924-e166-ec8b-ee48e4f6833e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1728719037.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Hi Isaku,
On 10/12/2024 1:25 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> This patch series is for the kvm-coco-queue branch. The change for TDX KVM is
> included at the last. The test is done by create TDX vCPU and run, get TSC
> offset via vCPU device attributes and compare it with the TDX TSC OFFSET
> metadata. Because the test requires the TDX KVM and TDX KVM kselftests, don't
> include it in this patch series.
>
>
> Background
> ----------
> X86 confidential computing technology defines protected guest TSC so that the
> VMM can't change the TSC offset/multiplier once vCPU is initialized and the
> guest can trust TSC. The SEV-SNP defines Secure TSC as optional. TDX mandates
> it. The TDX module determines the TSC offset/multiplier. The VMM has to
> retrieve them.
>
> On the other hand, the x86 KVM common logic tries to guess or adjust the TSC
> offset/multiplier for better guest TSC and TSC interrupt latency at KVM vCPU
> creation (kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate()), vCPU migration over pCPU
> (kvm_arch_vcpu_load()), vCPU TSC device attributes (kvm_arch_tsc_set_attr()) and
> guest/host writing to TSC or TSC adjust MSR (kvm_set_msr_common()).
>
>
> Problem
> -------
> The current x86 KVM implementation conflicts with protected TSC because the
> VMM can't change the TSC offset/multiplier. Disable or ignore the KVM
> logic to change/adjust the TSC offset/multiplier somehow.
>
> Because KVM emulates the TSC timer or the TSC deadline timer with the TSC
> offset/multiplier, the TSC timer interrupts are injected to the guest at the
> wrong time if the KVM TSC offset is different from what the TDX module
> determined.
>
> Originally the issue was found by cyclic test of rt-test [1] as the latency in
> TDX case is worse than VMX value + TDX SEAMCALL overhead. It turned out that
> the KVM TSC offset is different from what the TDX module determines.
Can you provide what is the exact command line to reproduce this problem ?
Any links to this reported issue ?
>
>
> Solution
> --------
> The solution is to keep the KVM TSC offset/multiplier the same as the value of
> the TDX module somehow. Possible solutions are as follows.
> - Skip the logic
> Ignore (or don't call related functions) the request to change the TSC
> offset/multiplier.
> Pros
> - Logically clean. This is similar to the guest_protected case.
> Cons
> - Needs to identify the call sites.
>
> - Revert the change at the hooks after TSC adjustment
> x86 KVM defines the vendor hooks when the TSC offset/multiplier are
> changed. The callback can revert the change.
> Pros
> - We don't need to care about the logic to change the TSC offset/multiplier.
> Cons:
> - Hacky to revert the KVM x86 common code logic.
>
> Choose the first one. With this patch series, SEV-SNP secure TSC can be
> supported.
I am not sure how will this help SNP Secure TSC, as the GUEST_TSC_OFFSET and
GUEST_TSC_SCALE are only available to the guest.
Regards,
Nikunj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 7:55 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: kvm-coco-queue: Support protected TSC Isaku Yamahata
2024-10-12 7:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Push down setting vcpu.arch.user_set_tsc Isaku Yamahata
2024-10-12 7:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Don't allow tsc_offset, tsc_scaling_ratio to change Isaku Yamahata
2024-10-14 15:48 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-11-21 23:50 ` Isaku Yamahata
2025-03-12 12:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-03-14 0:39 ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-10-14 14:47 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania [this message]
2024-10-25 16:24 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: kvm-coco-queue: Support protected TSC Marcelo Tosatti
2024-10-27 14:06 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-28 16:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2024-10-29 4:04 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-10-29 13:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2024-10-28 12:48 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-11-21 23:32 ` Isaku Yamahata
2025-03-12 1:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2025-03-14 0:43 ` Isaku Yamahata
2025-03-12 12:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-03-12 13:07 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4df36dc-9924-e166-ec8b-ee48e4f6833e@amd.com \
--to=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox