From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"ashish.kalra@amd.com" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"dwmw@amazon.co.uk" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"nik.borisov@suse.com" <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"sagis@google.com" <sagis@google.com>,
"Chen, Farrah" <farrah.chen@intel.com>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] KVM: TDX: Explicitly do WBINVD when no more TDX SEAMCALLs
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 11:22:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c736d2040f5452585e670819621d3bae5417fff4.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78253405-bff8-476c-a505-3737a499151b@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2025-08-20 at 11:51 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 8/19/25 23:53, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-08-19 at 12:31 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > 2) ... but anyway, KVM is the wrong place to do the test. If anything,
> > > since we need a v7 to change the unnecessary stub, you could move that
> > > stub under #ifndef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE and rename the function to
> > > tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec().
> >
> > Agreed on renaming to tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec().
> >
> > But with the "for_kexec()" part in the function name, it already implies
> > it is related to kexec, and I kinda think there's no need to test
> > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) anymore.
> >
> > One of the main purpose of this series is to unblock TDX_HOST and KEXEC in
> > the Kconfig, since otherwise I've been told distros will simply choose to
> > disable TDX_HOST in the Kconfig. So in reality, I suppose they will be on
> > together probably in like 95% cases, if not 100%.
> >
> > If we want to test CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE in tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec(),
> > then it would be a little bit weird that why we don't test it in other
> > places, e.g., when setting up the boolean. Testing it in all places would
> > make the code unnecessarily long and harder to read.
>
> No I don't mean testing it there, but just making
> tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec() a stub when CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is
> undefined:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> index e9a213582f03..913199b1954b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> @@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ u64 tdh_mem_page_remove(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa, u64 level, u64 *ext_err1, u6
> u64 tdh_phymem_cache_wb(bool resume);
> u64 tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_tdr(struct tdx_td *td);
> u64 tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_hkid(u64 hkid, struct page *page);
> -void tdx_cpu_flush_cache(void);
> #else
> static inline void tdx_init(void) { }
> static inline int tdx_cpu_enable(void) { return -ENODEV; }
> @@ -225,8 +224,13 @@ static inline int tdx_enable(void) { return -ENODEV; }
> static inline u32 tdx_get_nr_guest_keyids(void) { return 0; }
> static inline const char *tdx_dump_mce_info(struct mce *m) { return NULL; }
> static inline const struct tdx_sys_info *tdx_get_sysinfo(void) { return NULL; }
> -static inline void tdx_cpu_flush_cache(void) { }
> #endif /* CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> +void tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec(void) { }
> +#endif
> +
I think one minor issue here is, when CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST is off but
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is on, there will be no implementation of
tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec(). This won't result in build error,
though, because when TDX_HOST is off, KVM_INTEL_TDX will be off too, i.e.,
there won't be any caller of tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec().
But this still doesn't look nice?
Btw, the above will provide the stub function when both KEXEC_CORE and
TDX_HOST is off, which seems to be a step back too?
:-)
To me, it's more straightforward to just rename it to
tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec() and remove the stub:
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
index e9a213582f03..5e37ae1a40e8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ u64 tdh_mem_page_remove(struct tdx_td *td, u64 gpa,
u64 level, u64 *ext_err1, u6
u64 tdh_phymem_cache_wb(bool resume);
u64 tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_tdr(struct tdx_td *td);
u64 tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_hkid(u64 hkid, struct page *page);
-void tdx_cpu_flush_cache(void);
+void tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec(void);
#else
static inline void tdx_init(void) { }
static inline int tdx_cpu_enable(void) { return -ENODEV; }
@@ -225,7 +225,6 @@ static inline int tdx_enable(void) { return -ENODEV;
}
static inline u32 tdx_get_nr_guest_keyids(void) { return 0; }
static inline const char *tdx_dump_mce_info(struct mce *m) { return NULL;
}
static inline const struct tdx_sys_info *tdx_get_sysinfo(void) { return
NULL; }
-static inline void tdx_cpu_flush_cache(void) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST */
#endif /* !__ASSEMBLER__ */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index 1bc6f52e0cd7..382792e31f32 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ void tdx_disable_virtualization_cpu(void)
* remote CPUs to stop them. Doing WBINVD in stop_this_cpu()
* could potentially increase the possibility of the "race".
*/
- tdx_cpu_flush_cache();
+ tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec();
}
#define TDX_SEAMCALL_RETRIES 10000
diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
index c26e2e07ff6b..cd2a36dbbfc5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
@@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ u64 tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_hkid(u64 hkid, struct
page *page)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_hkid);
-void tdx_cpu_flush_cache(void)
+void tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec(void)
{
lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
@@ -1881,4 +1881,4 @@ void tdx_cpu_flush_cache(void)
wbinvd();
this_cpu_write(cache_state_incoherent, false);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_cpu_flush_cache);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_cpu_flush_cache_for_kexec);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-20 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 23:59 [PATCH v6 0/7] TDX host: kexec/kdump support Kai Huang
2025-08-13 23:59 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] x86/kexec: Consolidate relocate_kernel() function parameters Kai Huang
2025-08-15 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-18 1:15 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-13 23:59 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] x86/sme: Use percpu boolean to control WBINVD during kexec Kai Huang
2025-08-19 19:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-19 21:57 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-13 23:59 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] x86/virt/tdx: Mark memory cache state incoherent when making SEAMCALL Kai Huang
2025-08-13 23:59 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] x86/kexec: Disable kexec/kdump on platforms with TDX partial write erratum Kai Huang
2025-08-13 23:59 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] x86/virt/tdx: Remove the !KEXEC_CORE dependency Kai Huang
2025-08-13 23:59 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] x86/virt/tdx: Update the kexec section in the TDX documentation Kai Huang
2025-08-13 23:59 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] KVM: TDX: Explicitly do WBINVD when no more TDX SEAMCALLs Kai Huang
2025-08-14 13:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-14 15:38 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-14 18:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-14 22:19 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-14 23:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-15 0:00 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-19 10:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-19 21:53 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-20 9:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-20 11:22 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2025-08-20 20:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-20 21:34 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-20 15:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-14 22:25 ` Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c736d2040f5452585e670819621d3bae5417fff4.camel@intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=farrah.chen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).