public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com,
	zhiyuan.lv@intel.com, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf/x86/intel: Get shared reg constraints first for vLBR
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:25:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca71fc1f-280e-19ff-ce0f-8befa29f45cd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230616113353.45202-2-xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>

On 16/6/2023 7:33 pm, Xiong Zhang wrote:
> When host has per cpu pinned LBR event and guest use LBR also, host
> couldn't get correct LBR data, as the physical LBR is preempted by
> guest.
> 
> The rule for multi events sharing LBR is defined in
> __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints(), but guest vLBR event skips this
> function, so even if host has per cpu pinned LBR event, guest vLBR event
> could get constraints successfully and make vlbr_exclude_host returns true,
> finally host couldn't enable LBR in intel_pmu_lbr_enable_all().

Although it goes against the "per cpu pinned LBR event" priority expectation,
the order is intentionally specified. For two reasons:

- vlbr uses the fake event mechanism in its implementation, a presence similar to
   BTS event, thus the question here is whether we can get the per cpu pinned BTS
   event to work as expected;

- this change should not be applied first before KVM has done a good job
   of making guest lbr and other lbr events coexist correctly;

In treating vlbr event as an ordinary perf_event behind a guest counter that
is expected to comply equally with the scheduling rules of host perf, the first
thing we need to address is how a guest counter should continue to function
during the time when the backend event is preempted by a higher priority one.

> 
> This commit move intel_vlbr_constraints() behind
> intel_shared_regs_constraints(), guest vLBR event will use LBR also and it
> should get LBR resource through intel_shared_regs_constraints().
> 
> Fixes: 097e4311cda9 ("perf/x86: Add constraint to create guest LBR event without hw counter")
> Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 6fd3cd97a6ac..2e27a69e9725 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3347,15 +3347,15 @@ __intel_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
>   {
>   	struct event_constraint *c;
>   
> -	c = intel_vlbr_constraints(event);
> +	c = intel_bts_constraints(event);
>   	if (c)
>   		return c;
>   
> -	c = intel_bts_constraints(event);
> +	c = intel_shared_regs_constraints(cpuc, event);
>   	if (c)
>   		return c;
>   
> -	c = intel_shared_regs_constraints(cpuc, event);
> +	c = intel_vlbr_constraints(event);
>   	if (c)
>   		return c;
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-28  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-16 11:33 [PATCH 0/4] Part of fix for host and guest LBR event coexist Xiong Zhang
2023-06-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf/x86/intel: Get shared reg constraints first for vLBR Xiong Zhang
2023-06-28  4:25   ` Like Xu [this message]
2023-06-29  2:11     ` Zhang, Xiong Y
2023-06-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: VMX/pmu: Save host debugctlmsr just before vm entry Xiong Zhang
2023-06-23 20:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-25  4:03     ` Zhang, Xiong Y
2023-06-28  5:37       ` Like Xu
2023-06-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: VMX/pmu: Enable inactive vLBR event in guest LBR MSR emulation Xiong Zhang
2023-06-23 20:38   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-25  6:54     ` Zhang, Xiong Y
2023-06-26 17:00       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-27  3:29         ` Zhang, Xiong Y
2023-06-27 15:07           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-28  6:07             ` Like Xu
2023-06-28  5:50   ` Like Xu
2023-06-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add test case for guest and host LBR preemption Xiong Zhang
2023-06-28  6:27   ` Like Xu
2023-06-29  2:39     ` Zhang, Xiong Y
2023-06-28  9:27   ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-06-29  2:52     ` Zhang, Xiong Y
2023-06-30  2:05       ` Yang, Weijiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca71fc1f-280e-19ff-ce0f-8befa29f45cd@gmail.com \
    --to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiong.y.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhiyuan.lv@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox