From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5CDC4320E for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C8861154 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236625AbhH3MGp (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:06:45 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:16882 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237051AbhH3MGJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:06:09 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 17UC42Lk169121; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:05:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Y5H+fFogofucQYpVp4keglQZDmK0zcRTHtHkdIFs9RU=; b=SqKmKmNrLDdqSpzSTjzmyI1UNiZbmUnamNijkOT8kHM8LonnnTGPDBL1LNXQMeKTDs7A Jfc4wDBqNDS/jydK7Pyr12cjiOA6VZldhoi0afaa1tRnDNn1LtLBTF72Fns6j321H3CK advbLiCR2ba5w/7+MM6CrLsO0ZfAGaOCHJppV71ZvqEm6xXKNV7zC3ZHINvPcEMPEhfj 50LWplla3BJaSvG2uTLd5IvEsCT14BmsmKHNNruCUL1K1oXqbBFm86l5Jtbs9ynJqQpA JDSnb3q5YfmTSlTe8V877AiiwkO2vL38xtOPf0cjggK8enKLWnYVPHt5xQ4jf+eTCKDK +Q== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3arwpxt3w3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:05:10 -0400 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 17UC5AY0178018; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:05:10 -0400 Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3arwpxt3v0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:05:10 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 17UBucbk014529; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:05:08 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3aqcs8awgf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:05:07 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 17UC53oj18940192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:05:03 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7917C4C075; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:05:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D3F4C06D; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:05:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc3016276355.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.33.184]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:05:02 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] s390x: ccw: A simple test device for virtio CCW To: Christian Borntraeger , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Michael S Tsirkin Cc: thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com References: <1630061450-18744-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> From: Pierre Morel Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:05:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: AAKs2K-QVxX9SLHWyDJcCPziSYtvbHDx X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 1mjDDIWDRh7Z02hEXHklvlEDxkAgBMIn X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.790 definitions=2021-08-30_04:2021-08-30,2021-08-30 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2108300087 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 8/30/21 11:51 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 27.08.21 12:50, Pierre Morel wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> >> This series presents a VIRTIO test device which receives data on its >> input channel and sends back a simple checksum for the data it received >> on its output channel. >> The goal is to allow a simple VIRTIO device driver to check the VIRTIO >> initialization and various data transfer. >> >> For this I introduced a new device ID for the device and having no >> Linux driver but a kvm-unit-test driver, I have the following >> questions: > > I think we should reserve an ID in the official virtio spec then for > such a device? Yes, you are right, I think we should. > Maybe also add mst for such things. Yes, I did. Thanks, Pierre -- Pierre Morel IBM Lab Boeblingen