From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
To: dwmw2@infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, dwmw@amazon.co.uk,
paul@xen.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe.jin@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Mitigate kvm-clock drift caused by masterclock update
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:37:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cea56100-9c43-4246-912b-234c6cfdc876@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260115202256.119820-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Hi David,
On 1/15/26 12:22 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> As noted in commit c52ffadc65e2 ("KVM: x86: Don't unnecessarily
> force masterclock update on vCPU hotplug"), each unnecessary
> KVM_REQ_MASTERCLOCK_UPDATE can cause the kvm-clock time to jump.
>
> Although that commit addressed the kvm-clock drift issue during vCPU
> hotplugl there are still unnecessary KVM_REQ_MASTERCLOCK_UPDATE requests
> during live migration on the target host.
>
> The patchset below was authored by David Woodhouse. Two of the patches aim
> to avoid unnecessary KVM_REQ_MASTERCLOCK_UPDATE requests.
>
> [RFC PATCH v3 00/21] Cleaning up the KVM clock mess
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240522001817.619072-1-dwmw2@infradead.org/
>
> [RFC PATCH v3 10/21] KVM: x86: Fix software TSC upscaling in kvm_update_guest_time()
> [RFC PATCH v3 15/21] KVM: x86: Allow KVM master clock mode when TSCs are offset from each other
>
> The current patchset has three patches.
>
> PATCH 1 is a partial copy of "[RFC PATCH v3 10/21] KVM: x86: Fix software
> TSC upscaling in kvm_update_guest_time()", as Sean suggested, "Please do
> this in a separate patch. There's no need to squeeze it in here, and this
> change is complex/subtle enough as it is.", and David's authorship is
> preserved.
>
Please let me know if this is inappropriate and whether I should have
confirmed with you before reusing your code from the patch below, with your
authorship preserved.
[RFC PATCH v3 10/21] KVM: x86: Fix software TSC upscaling in kvm_update_guest_time()
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240522001817.619072-11-dwmw2@infradead.org/
The objective is to trigger a discussion on whether there is any quick,
short-term solution to mitigate the kvm-clock drift issue. We can also
resurrect your patchset.
I have some other work in QEMU userspace.
[PATCH 1/1] target/i386/kvm: account blackout downtime for kvm-clock and guest TSC
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20251009095831.46297-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com/
The combination of changes in QEMU and this KVM patchset can make kvm-clock
drift during live migration very very trivial.
Thank you very much!
Dongli Zhang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-15 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-15 20:22 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Mitigate kvm-clock drift caused by masterclock update Dongli Zhang
2026-01-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: Fix compute_guest_tsc() to cope with negative delta Dongli Zhang
2026-01-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: conditionally clear KVM_REQ_MASTERCLOCK_UPDATE at the end of KVM_SET_CLOCK Dongli Zhang
2026-05-09 20:04 ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-12 0:21 ` Dongli Zhang
2026-05-12 7:19 ` David Woodhouse
2026-01-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: conditionally update masterclock data in pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy() Dongli Zhang
2026-05-09 12:22 ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-12 0:16 ` Dongli Zhang
2026-05-12 5:21 ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-12 23:23 ` Dongli Zhang
2026-01-15 20:37 ` Dongli Zhang [this message]
2026-01-15 21:13 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Mitigate kvm-clock drift caused by masterclock update David Woodhouse
2026-01-16 9:31 ` Dongli Zhang
2026-01-22 5:01 ` Dongli Zhang
2026-01-24 1:31 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cea56100-9c43-4246-912b-234c6cfdc876@oracle.com \
--to=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox