* [PATCH 0/4] treewide: Make definitions of struct kernel_param_ops const @ 2020-10-04 0:18 Joe Perches 2020-10-04 0:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm x86/mmu: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const Joe Perches 2020-10-04 1:19 ` Where is the declaration of buffer used in kernel_param_ops .get functions? Joe Perches 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2020-10-04 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sean Christopherson, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Wanpeng Li, Jim Mattson, Joerg Roedel, Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, Joel Fernandes, kvm-ppc, kvm, rcu, linux-mm Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Using const is good as it reduces data size. Joe Perches (4): KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Make struct kernel_param_ops definition const kvm x86/mmu: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const rcu/tree: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const mm/zswap: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 4 ++-- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++-- mm/zswap.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.26.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] kvm x86/mmu: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const 2020-10-04 0:18 [PATCH 0/4] treewide: Make definitions of struct kernel_param_ops const Joe Perches @ 2020-10-04 0:18 ` Joe Perches 2020-10-05 17:14 ` Ben Gardon 2020-10-04 1:19 ` Where is the declaration of buffer used in kernel_param_ops .get functions? Joe Perches 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2020-10-04 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Wanpeng Li, Jim Mattson, Joerg Roedel Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Borislav Petkov, x86, H. Peter Anvin, Ben Gardon, kvm, linux-kernel These should be const, so make it so. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 71aa3da2a0b7..6500dd681750 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ static uint __read_mostly nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio = 60; static int set_nx_huge_pages(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp); static int set_nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp); -static struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_ops = { +static const struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_ops = { .set = set_nx_huge_pages, .get = param_get_bool, }; -static struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio_ops = { +static const struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio_ops = { .set = set_nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio, .get = param_get_uint, }; -- 2.26.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] kvm x86/mmu: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const 2020-10-04 0:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm x86/mmu: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const Joe Perches @ 2020-10-05 17:14 ` Ben Gardon 2020-10-19 15:50 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Ben Gardon @ 2020-10-05 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Wanpeng Li, Jim Mattson, Joerg Roedel, Thomas Gleixner, Borislav Petkov, x86, H. Peter Anvin, kvm, LKML On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 5:18 PM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > > These should be const, so make it so. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > index 71aa3da2a0b7..6500dd681750 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > @@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ static uint __read_mostly nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio = 60; > static int set_nx_huge_pages(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp); > static int set_nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp); > > -static struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_ops = { > +static const struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_ops = { > .set = set_nx_huge_pages, > .get = param_get_bool, > }; > > -static struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio_ops = { > +static const struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio_ops = { > .set = set_nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio, > .get = param_get_uint, > }; > -- > 2.26.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] kvm x86/mmu: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const 2020-10-05 17:14 ` Ben Gardon @ 2020-10-19 15:50 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-10-19 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Gardon, Joe Perches Cc: Sean Christopherson, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Wanpeng Li, Jim Mattson, Joerg Roedel, Thomas Gleixner, Borislav Petkov, x86, H. Peter Anvin, kvm, LKML On 05/10/20 19:14, Ben Gardon wrote: > Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> Queued, thanks. Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Where is the declaration of buffer used in kernel_param_ops .get functions? 2020-10-04 0:18 [PATCH 0/4] treewide: Make definitions of struct kernel_param_ops const Joe Perches 2020-10-04 0:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm x86/mmu: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const Joe Perches @ 2020-10-04 1:19 ` Joe Perches 2020-10-04 1:36 ` Matthew Wilcox 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2020-10-04 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc, kvm, rcu, linux-mm These patches came up because I was looking for the location of the declaration of the buffer used in kernel/params.c struct kernel_param_ops .get functions. I didn't find it. I want to see if it's appropriate to convert the sprintf family of functions used in these .get functions to sysfs_emit. Patches submitted here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5d606519698ce4c8f1203a2b35797d8254c6050a.1600285923.git.joe@perches.com/T/ Anyone know if it's appropriate to change the sprintf-like uses in these functions to sysfs_emit and/or sysfs_emit_at? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Where is the declaration of buffer used in kernel_param_ops .get functions? 2020-10-04 1:19 ` Where is the declaration of buffer used in kernel_param_ops .get functions? Joe Perches @ 2020-10-04 1:36 ` Matthew Wilcox 2020-10-04 2:11 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2020-10-04 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches Cc: Greg KH, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc, kvm, rcu, linux-mm On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 06:19:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > These patches came up because I was looking for > the location of the declaration of the buffer used > in kernel/params.c struct kernel_param_ops .get > functions. > > I didn't find it. > > I want to see if it's appropriate to convert the > sprintf family of functions used in these .get > functions to sysfs_emit. > > Patches submitted here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5d606519698ce4c8f1203a2b35797d8254c6050a.1600285923.git.joe@perches.com/T/ > > Anyone know if it's appropriate to change the > sprintf-like uses in these functions to sysfs_emit > and/or sysfs_emit_at? There's a lot of preprocessor magic to wade through. I'm pretty sure this comes through include/linux/moduleparam.h and kernel/module.c. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Where is the declaration of buffer used in kernel_param_ops .get functions? 2020-10-04 1:36 ` Matthew Wilcox @ 2020-10-04 2:11 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2020-10-04 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Greg KH, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc, kvm, rcu, linux-mm On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 02:36 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 06:19:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > These patches came up because I was looking for > > the location of the declaration of the buffer used > > in kernel/params.c struct kernel_param_ops .get > > functions. > > > > I didn't find it. > > > > I want to see if it's appropriate to convert the > > sprintf family of functions used in these .get > > functions to sysfs_emit. > > > > Patches submitted here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5d606519698ce4c8f1203a2b35797d8254c6050a.1600285923.git.joe@perches.com/T/ > > > > Anyone know if it's appropriate to change the > > sprintf-like uses in these functions to sysfs_emit > > and/or sysfs_emit_at? > > There's a lot of preprocessor magic to wade through. > > I'm pretty sure this comes through include/linux/moduleparam.h > and kernel/module.c. Dunno, looked there, still can't find it. btw: The __module_param_call macro looks very dodgy as it uses both __used and __attribute__((unused)) and likely one of them should be removed (unused?) It looks like the comes from varying definitions of __attribute_used__ eventually converted to __used for old gcc versions 2, 3, and 4. 1da177e4c3f4:include/linux/compiler-gcc2.h:#define __attribute_used__ __attribute__((__unused__)) 1da177e4c3f4:include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h:# define __attribute_used__ __attribute__((__used__)) 1da177e4c3f4:include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h:# define __attribute_used__ __attribute__((__unused__)) 1da177e4c3f4:include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h:#define __attribute_used__ __attribute__((__used__)) Maybe: --- include/linux/moduleparam.h | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h index 47879fc7f75e..fc820b27fb00 100644 --- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h @@ -288,10 +288,10 @@ struct kparam_array /* Default value instead of permissions? */ \ static const char __param_str_##name[] = prefix #name; \ static struct kernel_param __moduleparam_const __param_##name \ - __used \ - __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \ - = { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \ - VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(perm), level, flags, { arg } } + __used __section("__param") __aligned(sizeof(void *)) = { \ + __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \ + VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(perm), level, flags, { arg } \ + } /* Obsolete - use module_param_cb() */ #define module_param_call(name, _set, _get, arg, perm) \ ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-19 15:50 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-10-04 0:18 [PATCH 0/4] treewide: Make definitions of struct kernel_param_ops const Joe Perches 2020-10-04 0:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm x86/mmu: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const Joe Perches 2020-10-05 17:14 ` Ben Gardon 2020-10-19 15:50 ` Paolo Bonzini 2020-10-04 1:19 ` Where is the declaration of buffer used in kernel_param_ops .get functions? Joe Perches 2020-10-04 1:36 ` Matthew Wilcox 2020-10-04 2:11 ` Joe Perches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).