From: Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: mmu: Always flush TLBs when enabling dirty logging
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:23:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6076d60-a7fb-1930-2ace-a0d6e2d19414@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yt8aDZDmu/yAwHHC@google.com>
On 7/25/22 15:32, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> ...
>
> If we go the "always flush" route, I would word the comment to explicitly call out
> that the alternative would be to check if the SPTE is MMU-writable.
>
> But my preference would actually be to keep the conditional flushing. Not because
> I think it will provide better performance (probably the opposite if anything),
> but because it documents the dependencies/rules in code, and because "always flush"
> reads like it's working around a KVM bug. It's not a super strong preference though.
>
> Partially, I think it'd be this?
>
This would work, but I am slightly leaning away from it because it could
increase CPU overhead in some cases. If you don't have a strong preference for
it, then I think we could just do an unconditional flush with a more detailed
comment explaining the interaction with clear_young() as well as the alternative
of checking the MMU-writable bit.
Thanks,
Junaid
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-26 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-23 2:41 [PATCH] kvm: x86: mmu: Always flush TLBs when enabling dirty logging Junaid Shahid
2022-07-25 17:27 ` David Matlack
2022-07-25 22:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-26 17:23 ` Junaid Shahid [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6076d60-a7fb-1930-2ace-a0d6e2d19414@google.com \
--to=junaids@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox