From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31941C433F5 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 10:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352168AbiFAKmz (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2022 06:42:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48086 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352160AbiFAKmv (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2022 06:42:51 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2786B6D39F; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 03:42:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1654080171; x=1685616171; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lsLWoFUywADLZhzpKKkETDsQTXdgFausLpKlbw44yQ0=; b=hZxniufXNs06JWy0NPmX8De8htF7qLo43Av+VTLHOfXsS1ATWGQKb33t CsAV5WnrsITGxti6aUli549x++gP76dZBKSa+MxCfy3psUjjYVWP8qHHo z5PnnGQHHVNiadd5u/0PZo5WJiplkwd91bwP4433nfHhJUmt/rTlOBy4o fSRKeiLgBOle7oH+hd5ewZtxgioObgMCcumRO5iYWJr/plcON5Mk/lYo6 Tt3z1VLZWTnnWacEhIqZaapIjcJXiDnUor8RbNf7GOWZTaZAI8uL3+FuA RqYuVYPiQre0rfTeCPcJcel7hJ2Xa+aPgMNhtsxp32u8CS73f2KpLyG1R Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10364"; a="338590678" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,268,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="338590678" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jun 2022 03:42:50 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,268,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="606196995" Received: from yangweij-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.29.254]) ([10.255.29.254]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jun 2022 03:42:48 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 18:42:45 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx, pmu: accept 0 for absent MSRs when host-initiated Content-Language: en-US To: Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "likexu@tencent.com" References: <20220531175450.295552-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20220531175450.295552-2-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4b59b1c0-112b-5e07-e613-607220c3b597@redhat.com> <2b3be388-400e-7871-7d73-aba50d49a9b7@intel.com> From: "Yang, Weijiang" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 6/1/2022 6:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 6/1/22 11:12, Yang, Weijiang wrote: >>> Yes, I agree.  I have started making some changes and pushed the >>> result to kvm/arch-lbr-for-weijiang. >>> >>> Most of the MSR handling is rewritten (and untested). >>> >>> The nested VMX handling was also completely broken so I just removed >>> it.  Instead, KVM should be adjusted so that it does not whine. >> Noted, I'll run tests based on it, thanks a lot! >> >> Has the branch been pushed? I cannot see it. > It's just lbr-for-weijiang, sorry for mistyping. Found it, thank you! > > Paolo >