From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] iommu: Add device dma ownership set/release interfaces
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:22:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d79acc01-eeaf-e6ac-0415-af498c355a00@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211116134603.GA2105516@nvidia.com>
Hi Jason,
On 11/16/21 9:46 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:57:30AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> On 11/15/21 9:14 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:05:42AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>> +enum iommu_dma_owner {
>>>> + DMA_OWNER_NONE,
>>>> + DMA_OWNER_KERNEL,
>>>> + DMA_OWNER_USER,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>
>>>> + enum iommu_dma_owner dma_owner;
>>>> + refcount_t owner_cnt;
>>>> + struct file *owner_user_file;
>>>
>>> I'd just overload the ownership into owner_user_file,
>>>
>>> NULL -> no owner
>>> (struct file *)1UL) -> kernel
>>> real pointer -> user
>>>
>>> Which could simplify a lot of the code dealing with the owner.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah! Sounds reasonable. I will make this in the next version.
>
> It would be good to figure out how to make iommu_attach_device()
> enforce no other driver binding as a kernel user without a file *, as
> Robin pointed to, before optimizing this.
>
> This fixes an existing bug where iommu_attach_device() only checks the
> group size and is vunerable to a hot plug increasing the group size
> after it returns. That check should be replaced by this series's logic
> instead.
As my my understanding, the essence of this problem is that only the
user owner of the iommu_group could attach an UNMANAGED domain to it.
If I understand it right, how about introducing a new interface to
allocate a user managed domain and storing the user file pointer in it.
--- a/include/linux/iommu.h
+++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct iommu_domain {
void *handler_token;
struct iommu_domain_geometry geometry;
struct iommu_dma_cookie *iova_cookie;
+ struct file *owner_user_file;
};
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -1902,6 +1902,18 @@ struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain_alloc(struct
bus_type *bus)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_domain_alloc);
+struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain_alloc_user(struct bus_type *bus,
+ struct file *filep)
+{
+ struct iommu_domain *domain;
+
+ domain = __iommu_domain_alloc(bus, IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED);
+ if (domain)
+ domain->owner_user_file = filep;
+
+ return domain;
+}
When attaching a domain to an user-owned iommu_group, both group and
domain should have matched user fd.
Does above help here?
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-15 2:05 [PATCH 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 01/11] iommu: Add device dma ownership set/release interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16 1:57 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16 13:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-17 5:22 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2021-11-17 13:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-18 1:12 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-18 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-18 2:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-18 13:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-19 5:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-19 11:14 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-19 15:06 ` Jörg Rödel
2021-11-19 15:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-20 11:16 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-19 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16 1:52 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 02/11] driver core: Set DMA ownership during driver bind/unbind Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 6:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-15 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 15:37 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 15:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 18:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:35 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 19:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 03/11] PCI: pci_stub: Suppress kernel DMA ownership auto-claiming Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 15:14 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 16:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 17:54 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 18:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:44 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 19:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:58 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 21:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-15 22:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16 6:05 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 04/11] PCI: portdrv: " Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 20:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16 7:24 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16 20:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16 20:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 05/11] iommu: Add security context management for assigned devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16 7:25 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 06/11] iommu: Expose group variants of dma ownership interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16 9:42 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 07/11] vfio: Use DMA_OWNER_USER to declaim passthrough devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 08/11] vfio: Remove use of vfio_group_viable() Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 09/11] vfio: Delete the unbound_list Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 10/11] vfio: Remove iommu group notifier Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 2:05 ` [PATCH 11/11] iommu: Remove iommu group changes notifier Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d79acc01-eeaf-e6ac-0415-af498c355a00@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox