From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E2niel?= Fraga Subject: Re: [RFC] QEMU KVM target -> Anthony Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:43:09 -0300 Message-ID: References: <3810d4-k6b.ln1@tux.abusar.org> <45FD6C74.1090204@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:44:36 -0500 Anthony Liguori wrote: > I'm not entirely sure it's the right thing to do. The proper > solution is qops. > > I also don't think it's a good idea to merge things into KVM that > wouldn't be reasonable to integrate into upstream QEMU. I think this > is probably the case with this one. Ok, so for someone who wants to compile qemu with gcc4, what's the solution? I tried your patch, but it isn't applied correctly. Do you have an updated version of the patch? Thank you. -- http://u-br.net Linux 2.6.20: Homicidal Dwarf Hamster gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV