Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: TDX: Handle TDG.VP.VMCALL<GetQuote>

[Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>]

On 4/15/2025 9:51 AM, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 09:49 +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>>> index c6988e2c68d5..eca86b7f0cbc 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>>> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_exit {
>>>     #define KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY           37
>>>     #define KVM_EXIT_LOONGARCH_IOCSR  38
>>>     #define KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT     39
>>> +#define KVM_EXIT_TDX_GET_QUOTE    41
>> Number 40 is skipped and I was told internally the reason is mentioned
>> in cover letter
>>
>>       Note that AMD has taken 40 for KVM_EXIT_SNP_REQ_CERTS in the
>>       patch [4] under review, to avoid conflict, use number 41 for
>>       KVM_EXIT_TDX_GET_QUOTE and number 42 for
>>       KVM_EXIT_TDX_SETUP_EVENT_NOTIFY.
>>
>> I think we shouldn't give up number 40 unless this series depends on AMD
>> one or it's agreement that AMD one will be queued/merged earlier.
> Yes, if this patch needed to sit in kvm-coco-queue with AMD patches for awhile
> it might make sense. But it sounds like the plan is to include it in base
> support.
Right, now it seems that this patch could probably win the race upstream,
will use number 40 for KVM_EXIT_TDX_GET_QUOTE in the next version if no
objections.