public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Wanpeng Li" <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
	"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	"Pedro Fonseca" <pfonseca@cs.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] KVM: X86: Fix operand/address-size during instruction decoding
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 13:16:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddbd1053-d2f0-f323-ffda-9da51e6ca05a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1509929689-2935-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>

On 06/11/2017 01:54, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
> 
> Pedro reported:
>   During tests that we conducted on KVM, we noticed that executing a "PUSH %ES"
>   instruction under KVM produces different results on both memory and the SP
>   register depending on whether EPT support is enabled. With EPT the SP is
>   reduced by 4 bytes (and the written value is 0-padded) but without EPT support
>   it is only reduced by 2 bytes. The difference can be observed when the CS.DB
>   field is 1 (32-bit) but not when it's 0 (16-bit).
> 
> The internal segment descriptor cache exist even in real/vm8096 mode. The CS.D 
> also should be respected instead of just default operand/address-size/66H 
> prefix/67H prefix during instruction decoding. This patch fixes it by also 
> adjusting operand/address-size according to CS.D.
> 
> Reported-by: Pedro Fonseca <pfonseca@cs.washington.edu>
> Tested-by: Pedro Fonseca <pfonseca@cs.washington.edu>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> Cc: Pedro Fonseca <pfonseca@cs.washington.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
> ---
> v4 -> v5:
>  * cleanup patch subject/description
> v3 -> v4:
>  * def_ad_bytes must be changed to 4
>  * separate X86EMUL_MODE_PROT16 altogether from the others
> v2 -> v3:
>  * cleanup the codes 
> v1 -> v2:
>  * respect cs.d for real/vm8096, other modes have already 
>    been considered in init_emulate_ctxt().
> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 8079d14..b4a87de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -5000,6 +5000,8 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len)
>  	bool op_prefix = false;
>  	bool has_seg_override = false;
>  	struct opcode opcode;
> +	u16 dummy;
> +	struct desc_struct desc;
>  
>  	ctxt->memop.type = OP_NONE;
>  	ctxt->memopp = NULL;
> @@ -5018,6 +5020,11 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len)
>  	switch (mode) {
>  	case X86EMUL_MODE_REAL:
>  	case X86EMUL_MODE_VM86:
> +		def_op_bytes = def_ad_bytes = 2;
> +		ctxt->ops->get_segment(ctxt, &dummy, &desc, NULL, VCPU_SREG_CS);
> +		if (desc.d)
> +			def_op_bytes = def_ad_bytes = 4;
> +		break;
>  	case X86EMUL_MODE_PROT16:
>  		def_op_bytes = def_ad_bytes = 2;
>  		break;
> 

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-06 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-06  0:54 [PATCH v6 1/3] KVM: X86: Fix operand/address-size during instruction decoding Wanpeng Li
2017-11-06  0:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] KVM: nVMX: Validate the IA32_BNDCFGS on nested VM-entry Wanpeng Li
2017-11-06 12:16   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-06  0:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] KVM: nVMX: Fix mmu context after VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME failure Wanpeng Li
2017-11-06 12:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-06 12:16 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-11-10 21:40 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] KVM: X86: Fix operand/address-size during instruction decoding Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ddbd1053-d2f0-f323-ffda-9da51e6ca05a@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=pfonseca@cs.washington.edu \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox