From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE23EC433DB for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1C665164 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232266AbhCGWuQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Mar 2021 17:50:16 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:48931 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230341AbhCGWuD (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Mar 2021 17:50:03 -0500 IronPort-SDR: idmNM8PHrrPE7S0CUQs1imn2m9Hef9vWn2GxtGdIKUwckAK6Hw8Uk5DSG4dDucVBUpCm4g2QJf ZH5maHoxJ98Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9916"; a="251963195" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,231,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="251963195" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2021 14:50:02 -0800 IronPort-SDR: t2TgmVgIRzyCY1eaGBDsNyFb86KvKjYMEPvb4sXTI7WgGA6ou91hu1D/wvrfFWXhRpmexM3YlI LUMqFt4tCZ3Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,231,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="402595373" Received: from ggkanher-mobl4.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.252.142.177]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2021 14:49:58 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX1 and SGX2 sub-features From: Kai Huang To: Dave Hansen , Haitao Huang , Borislav Petkov Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, jarkko@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:49:43 +1300 In-Reply-To: <22f8a4be-b0ec-dfc5-cf05-a2586ce7557c@intel.com> References: <20210301100037.GA6699@zn.tnic> <3fce1dd2abd42597bde7ae9496bde7b9596b2797.camel@intel.com> <20210301103043.GB6699@zn.tnic> <7603ef673997b6674f785d333a4f263c749d2cf3.camel@intel.com> <20210301105346.GC6699@zn.tnic> <20210301113257.GD6699@zn.tnic> <0adc41774945bf9d6e6a72a93b83c80aa8c59544.camel@intel.com> <22f8a4be-b0ec-dfc5-cf05-a2586ce7557c@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 07:58 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 3/2/21 7:48 AM, Haitao Huang wrote: > > > > Hi Haitao, Jarkko, > > > > Do you have more concrete use case of needing "sgx2" in /proc/cpuinfo? > > Kai, please remove it from your series. I'm not hearing any arguments > remotely close enough to what Boris would require in order to keep it. Yes I will do. Thanks.