From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull my kvm-ppc-next branch Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:10:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160913045811.filyp74iiu2egivf@oak.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Paul Mackerras , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:34977 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751042AbcIMNKO (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:10:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160913045811.filyp74iiu2egivf@oak.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 13/09/2016 06:58, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Paolo, > > Please do a pull from my kvm-ppc-next branch to get PPC KVM updates > for v4.9. The highlights are: > > * Reduced latency for interrupts from PCI pass-through devices, from > Suresh Warrier and me. > * Halt-polling implementation from Suraj Jitindar Singh. > * 64-bit VCPU statistics, also from Suraj. > * Various other minor fixes and improvements. > > This includes the patches on my kvm-ppc-infrastructure branch, which > is also available for Michael Ellerman to pull into the powerpc tree. > Unfortunately I put in Paolo's patch to move hmi.c, not realizing that > Ben had already sent it to Linus. However, since the patch is > identical, git merges it without complaint, so I have left it in, > because otherwise I would have to rebase my kvm-ppc-next branch, which > I try very hard not to do. Paolo, if you prefer me to rebase my > kvm-ppc-{next,infrastructure} branches to remove the patch, let me > know. No problem! This should be fine. I don't expect conflicts because book3s_hv_hmi.c is unlikely to see changes between now and my 4.9 pull request. Branch pulled, thanks. Paolo