From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Janosch Frank Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: s390: vsie: Consolidate CRYCB validation Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:16:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1535019956-23539-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4AufDwxOAF4Deib5VEREhQv3Ge5f7DSyp" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com To: Pierre Morel , david@redhat.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1535019956-23539-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --4AufDwxOAF4Deib5VEREhQv3Ge5f7DSyp Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="hQvCgm1dOeyLQsA2n7H7dWQrbJ34mw798"; protected-headers="v1" From: Janosch Frank To: Pierre Morel , david@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: s390: vsie: Consolidate CRYCB validation References: <1535019956-23539-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1535019956-23539-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> --hQvCgm1dOeyLQsA2n7H7dWQrbJ34mw798 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/23/18 12:25 PM, Pierre Morel wrote: > Before adapting the CRYCB shadowing for a guest supporting > the AP instructions we want to clean the CRYCB shadowing code. >=20 > First patch seem obvious. >=20 > Second patch introduce a change in the behavior of > the virtual machine in that the CRYCB is validated > whenever we use or not the key masks to mimic the > real machine. >=20 > Patch 3 does not correct the compiled code but make > more clear what is done concerning the formating of > the CRYCB in the guest original CRYCB and in the > shadow CRYCB. >=20 Thanks, applied. --hQvCgm1dOeyLQsA2n7H7dWQrbJ34mw798-- --4AufDwxOAF4Deib5VEREhQv3Ge5f7DSyp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJbfrOXAAoJEBcO/8Q8ZEV5WO0P/RKEf6WEQ/l3QNRj5glgaGAc RQNcE4+mwGZbSyINuGr8aoPOwMZTTt/EBMnhYt+tg+wWXS9iJErtvVeyOX7Cfi2Q 4nrfQQsdH8Pb89YqvyjReUSkpcj1+MEOYjH8DTkGc0j9P1+1xAZ2RY49HxgZbzOS 9q8fEGORe2tX0GXnkv0XxHHePzOt/lxycjL51nNT+qf3IFAMtCnnAs+ETp2VBCdu hgIegzQQAlNFHg17lZRZRGBL8Yyv+fLuiHHtC6miOjtyqEWxjSiZRlWeSm2EDpGZ fWJXw3ouAo5/ab6gMrLEK7pYmhZb9O/x4dXitpkhP3wNua4IFoHXaXd9/KGW5GON Pad1pkCTDjMtGPrOCPgLCxL86YMvMz7OQonI1lEL1R+KERGT1j8I5biSOp7Eh7AZ GaT/PYgJV5vydB1iett6+N6ufA9D2wEvznXFVZs/0O4kHSz+mAjdGTs6DejWbOTX /cKDUMXlnMPwYj7vBy+Y9NkrJskJ/26+eXlhJoW9lVr85q1Lal78sbajJ6Con/EA fvk1TEa+EANNc4NNFfvCHneqzDN7Ip6a9UvNGLHC4Y/YwBYNIk9JdM5VulyD5sWx cLY+SbNO0ArgC4Xmm3vf+wMAC4f14UMirUtXwhiawYGTSuCNTL/29K+IvlVLhvnF v8E9/HHGOnrFAo17dMXt =vbBn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4AufDwxOAF4Deib5VEREhQv3Ge5f7DSyp--