public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfio: Simplify vfio_create_group()
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:45:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2da7cc7-1de7-8152-9d7c-970271a6f5b8@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1-v1-ef00ffecea52+2cb-iommu_group_lifetime_jgg@nvidia.com>

On 9/8/22 2:44 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The vfio.group_lock is now only used to serialize vfio_group creation
> and destruction, we don't need a micro-optimization of searching,
> unlocking, then allocating and searching again. Just hold the lock
> the whole time.
> 
> Rename the function to 'vfio_get_group()' to reflect that it doesn't
> always create something.
> move
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 77264d836d5200..4ab13808b536e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -319,17 +319,6 @@ __vfio_group_get_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static struct vfio_group *
> -vfio_group_get_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
> -{
> -	struct vfio_group *group;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
> -	group = __vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
> -	mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
> -	return group;
> -}
> -
>  static void vfio_group_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct vfio_group *group = container_of(dev, struct vfio_group, dev);
> @@ -376,16 +365,26 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_alloc(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
>  	return group;
>  }
>  
> -static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
> -		enum vfio_group_type type)
> +/*
> + * Return a struct vfio_group * for the given iommu_group. If no vfio_group
> + * already exists then create a new one.
> + */
> +static struct vfio_group *vfio_get_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
> +					 enum vfio_group_type type)
>  {
>  	struct vfio_group *group;
>  	struct vfio_group *ret;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	group = vfio_group_alloc(iommu_group, type);
> -	if (IS_ERR(group))
> -		return group;
> +	mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
> +
> +	ret = __vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_unlock;
> +
> +	group = ret = vfio_group_alloc(iommu_group, type);
> +	if (IS_ERR(ret))
> +		goto err_unlock;
>  
>  	err = dev_set_name(&group->dev, "%s%d",
>  			   group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU ? "noiommu-" : "",
> @@ -395,13 +394,6 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
>  		goto err_put;
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
> -
> -	/* Did we race creating this group? */
> -	ret = __vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto err_unlock;
> -
>  	err = cdev_device_add(&group->cdev, &group->dev);
>  	if (err) {
>  		ret = ERR_PTR(err);
> @@ -413,10 +405,10 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
>  	mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
>  	return group;
>  
> -err_unlock:
> -	mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
>  err_put:
>  	put_device(&group->dev);
> +err_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -514,7 +506,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev,
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_put_group;
>  
> -	group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, type);
> +	group = vfio_get_group(iommu_group, type);
>  	if (IS_ERR(group)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(group);
>  		goto out_remove_device;
> @@ -564,9 +556,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  	}
>  
> -	group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
> -	if (!group)
> -		group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, VFIO_IOMMU);
> +	group = vfio_get_group(iommu_group, VFIO_IOMMU);
>  
>  	/* The vfio_group holds a reference to the iommu_group */
>  	iommu_group_put(iommu_group);


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-20 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-08 18:44 [PATCH 0/4] Fix splats releated to using the iommu_group after destroying devices Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-08 18:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] vfio: Simplify vfio_create_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-20 19:45   ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2022-09-08 18:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] vfio: Move the sanity check of the group to vfio_create_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-22 19:10   ` Alex Williamson
2022-09-22 19:36     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-22 21:23       ` Alex Williamson
2022-09-22 23:12         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-08 18:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] vfio: Follow a strict lifetime for struct iommu_group * Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-20 19:32   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-09-08 18:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] iommu: Fix ordering of iommu_release_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-08 21:05   ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-08 21:27     ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-08 21:43       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-09  9:05         ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-09 13:25           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-09 17:57             ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-09 18:30               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-09 19:55                 ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-09 23:45                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-12 11:13                     ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-22 16:56                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-09 12:49 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix splats releated to using the iommu_group after destroying devices Matthew Rosato
2022-09-09 16:24   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2da7cc7-1de7-8152-9d7c-970271a6f5b8@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox