Re: [PATCH 20/21] KVM: TDX: Finalize VM initialization

[Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>]

On 10/09/24 13:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 9/4/24 17:37, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Isaku was going to lock the mmu.  Seems like the change got lost.
>> To protect against racing with KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY,
>> KVM_TDX_INIT_MEM_REGION, tdx_sept_set_private_spte() etc
>> e.g. Rename tdx_td_finalizemr to __tdx_td_finalizemr and add:
>>
>> static int tdx_td_finalizemr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_tdx_cmd *cmd)
>> {
>>     int ret;
>>
>>     write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>     ret = __tdx_td_finalizemr(kvm, cmd);
>>     write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>
>>     return ret;
>> }
> 
> kvm->slots_lock is better.  In tdx_vcpu_init_mem_region() you can take it before the is_td_finalized() so that there is a lock that is clearly protecting kvm_tdx->finalized between the two.  (I also suggest switching to guard() in tdx_vcpu_init_mem_region()).

Doesn't KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY also need to be protected?

> 
> Also, I think that in patch 16 (whether merged or not) nr_premapped should not be incremented, once kvm_tdx->finalized has been set?

tdx_sept_set_private_spte() checks is_td_finalized() to decide
whether to call tdx_mem_page_aug() or tdx_mem_page_record_premap_cnt()
Refer patch 14 "KVM: TDX: Implement hooks to propagate changes
of TDP MMU mirror page table" for the addition of
tdx_sept_set_private_spte()