From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, alex@shazbot.org, mattev@meta.com,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] vfio/pci: Avoid mapping BARs for devices with non-mappable BARs
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:41:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7b2da7b-2c70-46c2-9d07-6acc6949915e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729181116.1373-1-alifm@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/29/26 2:11 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
> vfio_pci_core_map_bars() calls pci_iomap() to set up BAR resources, but not
> all devices support having their BARs mapped by the CPU. The
> non_mappable_bars flag indicates that a PCI device's BARs cannot be
> accessed by the CPU. The ISM device on s390 is one such device. The BAR
> size for an ISM device is 256 TiB, and attempting to map the BAR will lead
> to warnings:
>
> vmalloc_node_range for size 281474976714752 failed: Address range
> restricted to 0x2110bab00000 - 0x21903ab00000
>
> Use pdev->non_mappable_bars to skip pci_iomap() for such devices. This flag
> is set by the PCI core at enumeration time and already serves the same
> purpose in vfio_pci_probe_mmaps().
>
> Fixes: 05f2a68b407a ("vfio/pci: Set up BAR resources and maps in vfio_pci_core_enable()")
> Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index 3f11a9624b9c..6a184588ff23 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> @@ -554,6 +554,9 @@ static void vfio_pci_core_map_bars(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
>
> vdev->barmap[bar] = IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> + if (pdev->non_mappable_bars)
> + continue;
> +
This would work for the ISM case at least, but I wonder: should we check
vdev->bar_mmap_supported[bar] instead?
My question boils down to: do we still want messages for some of the
cases where we set vdev->bar_mmap_supported[bar] = false in
vfio_pci_probe_mmaps()?
Or should the messages only print when we probed, thought the bar could
be mmap'd (vdev->bar_mmap_supported[bar] == true), and now hit a failure?
Thanks,
Matt
> if (!pci_resource_len(pdev, i))
> continue;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 18:11 [PATCH v1] vfio/pci: Avoid mapping BARs for devices with non-mappable BARs Farhan Ali
2026-07-29 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:41 ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2026-07-29 20:28 ` Farhan Ali
2026-07-29 20:36 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-29 21:32 ` Farhan Ali
2026-07-29 21:50 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7b2da7b-2c70-46c2-9d07-6acc6949915e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattev@meta.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox