From: "Chen, Zide" <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Das Sandipan <Sandipan.Das@amd.com>,
Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:38:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e806dc4c-1d61-4152-8bbf-33d8922745d2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d6a2a1c-3d96-4250-a967-2ff4109cb4b8@linux.intel.com>
On 6/23/2026 2:04 AM, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
>
> On 6/23/2026 12:19 PM, Zide Chen wrote:
>> From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Bit 15 in IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES indicates that the CPU provides
>> built-in support for Topdown Microarchitecture Analysis (TMA) L1
>> metrics via the IA32_PERF_METRICS MSR.
>>
>> Expose this capability only when mediated vPMU is enabled, as emulating
>> IA32_PERF_METRICS in the legacy vPMU model is impractical.
>>
>> Pass IA32_PERF_METRICS through to the guest only when mediated vPMU is
>> enabled and bit 15 is set in guest IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES. Allow
>> kvm_pmu_{get,set}_msr() to handle this MSR for host accesses.
>>
>> Save and restore this MSR on host/guest PMU context switches so that
>> host PMU activity does not clobber the guest value, and guest state
>> is not leaked into the host.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
>> ---
>> v4:
>> - Remove WARN_ON_ONCE() and simply reject the guest accesses by checking
>> host_initiated. (Sashiko)
>> - Passthru MSR_PERF_METRICS only if has_mediated_pmu is true. (Sashiko)
>> - Remove the redundant !! in vcpu_has_perf_metrics().
>> v3:
>> - Replace WARN_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE(). (Dapeng)
>> - Add comments to explain why don't validate writes on PERF_METRICS.
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.h | 5 ++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 7 ++++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 ++++-
>> 7 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index edd414f8ee95..4f549ef012d2 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>> u64 global_status_rsvd;
>> u64 reserved_bits;
>> u64 raw_event_mask;
>> + u64 perf_metrics;
>> struct kvm_pmc gp_counters[KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS];
>> struct kvm_pmc fixed_counters[KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS];
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>> index 18c4be75e927..fdcaeb6c8352 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@
>> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT 0xf00
>> #define PERF_CAP_FW_WRITES BIT_ULL(13)
>> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE BIT_ULL(14)
>> +#define PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS BIT_ULL(15)
>> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_TIMING_INFO BIT_ULL(17)
>> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK (PERF_CAP_PEBS_TRAP | PERF_CAP_ARCH_REG | \
>> PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT | PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE | \
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> index 1eb13673e889..bc2e1cbcd9b9 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ static inline bool is_topdown_idx(int idx)
>> #define GLOBAL_STATUS_ARCH_PEBS_THRESHOLD_BIT 54
>> #define GLOBAL_STATUS_ARCH_PEBS_THRESHOLD BIT_ULL(GLOBAL_STATUS_ARCH_PEBS_THRESHOLD_BIT)
>> #define GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT 48
>> +#define GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF BIT_ULL(GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT)
>>
>> #define GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS BIT_ULL(48)
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> index 59b7a90c79e1..2c3367f5e2df 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> @@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
>> switch (msr) {
>> case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
>> return kvm_pmu_has_perf_global_ctrl(pmu);
>> + case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
>> + return vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu);
>> case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE:
>> ret = vcpu_get_perf_capabilities(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT;
>> break;
>> @@ -345,6 +347,11 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>> case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
>> msr_info->data = pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl;
>> break;
>> + case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
>> + if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
>> + return 1;
>> + msr_info->data = pmu->perf_metrics;
>> + break;
>> case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE:
>> msr_info->data = pmu->pebs_enable;
>> break;
>> @@ -394,6 +401,16 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>> if (pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl != data)
>> reprogram_fixed_counters(pmu, data);
>> break;
>> + case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
>> + if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If TMA level 2 is not supported, bits [63:32] are reserved
>> + * and ignored on write, so no validation is needed here.
>> + */
>> + pmu->perf_metrics = data;
>> + break;
>> case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE:
>> if (data & pmu->pebs_enable_rsvd)
>> return 1;
>> @@ -589,6 +606,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> pmu->global_status_rsvd &=
>> ~MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL_TRACE_TOPA_PMI;
>>
>> + if (perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS) {
>> + pmu->global_ctrl_rsvd &= ~GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
>> + pmu->global_status_rsvd &= ~GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) {
>> if (perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE) {
>> pmu->pebs_enable_rsvd = counter_rsvd;
>> @@ -632,6 +654,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>
>> static void intel_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
>> +
>> + pmu->perf_metrics = 0;
>> intel_pmu_release_guest_lbr_event(vcpu);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -803,6 +828,13 @@ static void intel_mediated_pmu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
>> u64 global_status, toggle;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * PERF_METRICS MSR must be restored closely after fixed counter 3,
>> + * which was just restored by kvm_pmu_load_guest_pmcs().
>> + */
>> + if (vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu))
>> + wrmsrq(MSR_PERF_METRICS, pmu->perf_metrics);
>
> Copy Sashiko's comments here.
>
> "
>
> [Severity: High]
> If the guest is configured without PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS but with mediated
> PMU enabled, RDPMC exiting might be disabled. Since
> intel_mediated_pmu_load() skips writing to MSR_PERF_METRICS in this case,
> could the guest execute RDPMC and read the un-scrubbed host metrics, leaking
> host microarchitectural state?
>
> "
>
> This is a real concern. Besides MSR interception, we need to care about the
> rdpmc interception. When the guest has different configuration on perf
> metrics with host, rdpmc needs to be intercepted. Thanks.
Yes, my bad! This actuallly was in the initial implementation.
>> +
>> rdmsrq(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, global_status);
>> toggle = pmu->global_status ^ global_status;
>> if (global_status & toggle)
>> @@ -831,6 +863,12 @@ static void intel_mediated_pmu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> */
>> if (pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_hw)
>> wrmsrq(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, 0);
>> +
>> + if (vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu)) {
>> + pmu->perf_metrics = rdpmc(INTEL_PMC_FIXED_RDPMC_METRICS);
>> + if (pmu->perf_metrics)
>> + wrmsrq(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops __initdata = {
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.h
>> index 5d9357640aa1..57705773dc49 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.h
>> @@ -40,4 +40,9 @@ struct lbr_desc {
>>
>> extern struct x86_pmu_lbr vmx_lbr_caps;
>>
>> +static inline bool vcpu_has_perf_metrics(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + return vcpu_get_perf_capabilities(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS;
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* __KVM_X86_VMX_PMU_INTEL_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> index a1a5edb39a7e..584d99ef6026 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -4260,6 +4260,10 @@ static void vmx_recalc_pmu_msr_intercepts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> MSR_TYPE_RW, intercept);
>> vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
>> MSR_TYPE_RW, intercept);
>> +
>> + intercept = !has_mediated_pmu || !vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu);
>> + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_PERF_METRICS,
>> + MSR_TYPE_RW, intercept);
>> }
>>
>> static void vmx_recalc_msr_intercepts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> @@ -8084,6 +8088,9 @@ static __init u64 vmx_get_perf_capabilities(void)
>> perf_cap &= ~PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE;
>> }
>>
>> + if (enable_mediated_pmu)
>> + perf_cap |= host_perf_cap & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS;
>> +
>> return perf_cap;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index e872398c12fc..9623f558f359 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static const u32 msrs_to_save_pmu[] = {
>> MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR1,
>> MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR2, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR3,
>> MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS,
>> - MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL,
>> + MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, MSR_PERF_METRICS,
>> MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG,
>>
>> /* This part of MSRs should match KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_GP_COUNTERS. */
>> @@ -7679,6 +7679,10 @@ static void kvm_probe_msr_to_save(u32 msr_index)
>> intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges) * 2))
>> return;
>> break;
>> + case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
>> + if (!(kvm_caps.supported_perf_cap & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS))
>> + return;
>> + break;
>> case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 ...
>> MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 + KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS - 1:
>> if (msr_index - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 4:19 [PATCH V4 0/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Add hardware Topdown metrics support Zide Chen
2026-06-23 4:19 ` [PATCH V4 1/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not map fixed counters >= 3 to generic perf events Zide Chen
2026-06-23 4:19 ` [PATCH V4 2/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Support Intel fixed counter 3 on mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-06-23 4:19 ` [PATCH V4 3/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in " Zide Chen
2026-06-23 4:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 21:48 ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-23 23:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-06-24 3:16 ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-23 7:04 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-23 21:38 ` Chen, Zide [this message]
2026-06-23 4:19 ` [PATCH V4 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add perf_metrics and fixed counter 3 tests Zide Chen
2026-06-23 4:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e806dc4c-1d61-4152-8bbf-33d8922745d2@intel.com \
--to=zide.chen@intel.com \
--cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox