From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C8EC4332F for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237214AbiLNJnb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 04:43:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50100 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229757AbiLNJnT (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 04:43:19 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17E210EE; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 01:43:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A2BB816ED; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15BDAC433EF; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:43:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1671010996; bh=uut+hV+py5emy6howSBFzXtArJVZljieADDyI0cWYpo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cPLmhgJKLNx4gsb0xlxx3yfRK1F7tY1cR6GGJ9ucvTrjU8d7XbVcWxz9sj4nz76pn 3XWCoQhtzjzJg0NF0942XNAGNKnWLlwARVvkb5nGW99BbAwsVKs1HSxvNsfLNewdJr fOu545yq7Ho1HliIFRi8gkhBXysWBWGWk1qwNKoYTs8v2Bz1T3FYVAywCKIs24nBZf aMYQT3vivDNLhoG7WiRBdEooKYCTz47hbRPwdXZdN0uh5xgrP8ij1CUNdkoPd4CBOR dLgWp/6xBbV+ByOIeXM0E0dBYiNf3Jl3s+W9tS1GZGUNRizztiScmuN9fn615e3zcG vCApSYl6i7FbA== Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org ([51.254.78.96] helo=www.loen.fr) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1p5OID-00CZta-P7; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:43:13 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:43:13 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Oliver Upton , Tom Rix , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ricardo Koller , Aaron Lewis , Raghavendra Rao Ananta , David Matlack Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] KVM: selftests: Rename UNAME_M to ARCH_DIR, fill explicitly for x86 In-Reply-To: References: <20221213001653.3852042-1-seanjc@google.com> <20221213001653.3852042-7-seanjc@google.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.13 Message-ID: X-Sender: maz@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 51.254.78.96 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, trix@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ricarkol@google.com, aaronlewis@google.com, rananta@google.com, dmatlack@google.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 2022-12-13 20:03, Sean Christopherson wrote: > One last thought/question, what do y'all think about renaming > directories to > follow the kernel proper? I.e. aarch64=>arm64, s390x=>s390, and > x86_64=>x86. > Then $(ARCH_DIR) would go away. The churn would be unfortunate, but it > would be > nice to align with arch/ and tools/arch/. aarch64->arm64 makes sense to me. Whether it is worth the churn is another question. As long as we don't try to backport tests, the damage should be limited to a single merge window. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...