Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, alex@shazbot.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
	fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
	imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:58:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee819372-edee-445a-8373-138040c51a28@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812170945.738351-9-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>

On 8/12/26 1:09 PM, Anthony Krowiak wrote:
> When vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue() creates the sysfs attribute group,
> the queue's driver data has not yet been set. A concurrent read of
> the 'status' attribute can therefore call dev_get_drvdata() and
> get NULL, which is then passed directly to
> vfio_ap_mdev_for_queue() where q->apqn is unconditionally
> dereferenced, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
> 
> Fix this by acquiring the update locks before calling
> sysfs_create_group(). The status_show() function acquires
> guests_lock before reading the driver data, so any concurrent
> read will block until after dev_set_drvdata() has been called
> and the update locks are released.
> 
> As a bonus, the APQN no longer needs to be read from the queue
> struct after allocation — it can be read directly from apdev
> before allocation and stored in a local variable, which is then
> assigned to q->apqn once the allocation succeeds.
> 
> Fixes: 260f3ea141382 ("s390/vfio-ap: move probe and remove callbacks to vfio_ap_ops.c")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 16779cfc64e8..b0454a296c67 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -2424,14 +2424,17 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_unregister(void)
>  
>  int vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret, apqn;
>  	struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(apm_filtered, AP_DEVICES);
>  	struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
>  
> +	apqn = to_ap_queue(&apdev->device)->qid;
> +	matrix_mdev = get_update_locks_by_apqn(apqn);
> +
>  	ret = sysfs_create_group(&apdev->device.kobj, &vfio_queue_attr_group);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_release_locks;
>  
>  	q = kzalloc_obj(*q);
>  	if (!q) {
> @@ -2439,11 +2442,10 @@ int vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
>  		goto err_remove_group;
>  	}
>  
> -	q->apqn = to_ap_queue(&apdev->device)->qid;
> +	q->apqn = apqn;
>  	q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID;
>  	memset(&q->reset_status, 0, sizeof(q->reset_status));
>  	INIT_WORK(&q->reset_work, apq_reset_check);
> -	matrix_mdev = get_update_locks_by_apqn(q->apqn);
>  
>  	if (matrix_mdev) {
>  		vfio_ap_mdev_link_queue(matrix_mdev, q);
> @@ -2472,8 +2474,13 @@ int vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
>  	return ret;
>  
>  err_remove_group:
> +	release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);

I think now you've just shrunk the window instead of totally closed it?

Can't sysfs still be accessed between this release and the remove_group?

Do you think adding an additional NULL check against dev_get_drvdata()
in status_show() and treating the NULL case like the other error
conditions would be enough to cover that window? 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12 17:09 [PATCH v4 0/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix bugs in vfio_ap device driver callback functions Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix stale do_remove flag across iterations in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix dereference matrix_mdev->kvm without checking for NULL Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix missing lock required to access list of ap_matrix_mdev objects Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 18:25     ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during update of ap_matrix_mdev object Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix control domain removal in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] s390/vfio-ap: fix potential use of uninitialized apm_filtered bitmap Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix hot-unplug skipped when last AP adapter or domain removed Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:58   ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2026-08-12 18:16     ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:09 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix memory leak when queue removed from host AP config Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 17:38   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee819372-edee-445a-8373-138040c51a28@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox