From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/pmu: Disallow legacy LBRs if architectural LBRs are available
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:20:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f106a06e-ae6f-2c79-df87-721817aacc02@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230128001427.2548858-1-seanjc@google.com>
On 28/1/2023 8:14 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Disallow enabling LBR support if the CPU supports architectural LBRs.
> Traditional LBR support is absent on CPU models that have architectural
> LBRs, and KVM doesn't yet support arch LBRs, i.e. KVM will pass through
> non-existent MSRs if userspace enables LBRs for the guest.
True, we have call_trace due to MSR_ARCH_LBR_FROM_0 (0x1500) for example.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Fixes: 145dfad998ea ("KVM: VMX: Advertise PMU LBRs if and only if perf supports
LBRs")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>
> Am I missing something that would prevent this scenario?
>
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 8f0f67c75f35..77ee6b4a5ec4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -7761,9 +7761,11 @@ static u64 vmx_get_perf_capabilities(void)
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM))
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, host_perf_cap);
>
> - x86_perf_get_lbr(&lbr);
> - if (lbr.nr)
> - perf_cap |= host_perf_cap & PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT;
> + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR)) {
To avoid changing this again in the Arch lbr enabling part, how about:
x86_perf_get_lbr(&lbr);
if (lbr.nr && cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) ==
kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
perf_cap |= host_perf_cap & PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT;
?
> + x86_perf_get_lbr(&lbr);
> + if (lbr.nr)
> + perf_cap |= host_perf_cap & PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT;
> + }
>
> if (vmx_pebs_supported()) {
> perf_cap |= host_perf_cap & PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK;
>
> base-commit: 2de154f541fc5b9f2aed3fe06e218130718ce320
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-28 0:14 [PATCH] KVM: x86/pmu: Disallow legacy LBRs if architectural LBRs are available Sean Christopherson
2023-01-31 7:20 ` Like Xu [this message]
2023-02-02 19:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-03 5:59 ` Like Xu
2023-02-03 21:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-06 2:11 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f106a06e-ae6f-2c79-df87-721817aacc02@gmail.com \
--to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox