From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC176C5517A for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED5821D91 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732506AbgKKCOJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:14:09 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:11142 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731810AbgKKCOI (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:14:08 -0500 IronPort-SDR: nHVZEGs2bRPUx5xcWSx+9a/ECaBZtVqIgd2gzyXxTPZL8uUX3bn1LfA7grhJgBvzp1jVebjaig l3LwXJINrURw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9801"; a="254790992" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,468,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="254790992" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Nov 2020 18:14:08 -0800 IronPort-SDR: cMZtNvtN+8jSY8QwAHBtnpgpwlRODUadsCEbQXv8bBbstUNfw7kQj5BQ6o+50nP4z3C7T8JufN XakrnU77TVtg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,468,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="541589258" Received: from likexu-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.238.4.107]) ([10.238.4.107]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Nov 2020 18:14:04 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/11] perf/x86: Fix variable types for LBR registers To: Andi Kleen , Paolo Bonzini , Stephane Eranian Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , wei.w.wang@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <20200613080958.132489-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com> <20200613080958.132489-2-like.xu@linux.intel.com> <20201109063446.GM466880@tassilo.jf.intel.com> From: "Xu, Like" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:14:02 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201109063446.GM466880@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Paolo, As you may know, we have got host perf support in Linus' tree which provides a clear path for enabling guest LBR, will we merge the remaining LBR KVM patch set? --- [PATCH RESEND v13 00/10] Guest Last Branch Recording Enabling https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20201030035220.102403-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com/ Thanks, Like Xu On 2020/11/9 14:34, Andi Kleen wrote: > Hi, > > What's the status of this patchkit? It would be quite useful to me (and > various other people) to use LBRs in guest. I reviewed it earlier and the > patches all looked good to me. But i don't see it in any -next tree. > > Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen > > Could it please be merged? > > Thanks, > > -Andi