From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: page track: add a new notifier type: track_flush_slot Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:56:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1259cdba-c137-c3da-abe2-ecf51aec6738@linux.intel.com> <523e1446-75f1-fe3a-d818-f7d238d57751@redhat.com> <5800B579.9000705@intel.com> <20161014084158.623087aa@t450s.home> <20161014084601.2a50ba87@t450s.home> <20161014163545.GA6121@nvidia.com> <20161014105124.42b438a6@t450s.home> <20161014221901.GA8865@nvidia.com> <20161017100229.1474ae33@t450s.home> <580617BD.8000300@intel.com> <20161018085918.61ec0e93@t450s.home> <5806DB2D.6090306@intel.com> <2f04a53d-261c-7fb5-6825-117da6a1307d@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , Xiao Guangrong , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel , Xiaoguang Chen , Kirti Wankhede , Neo Jia To: Xiao Guangrong , Jike Song , Alex Williamson Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2f04a53d-261c-7fb5-6825-117da6a1307d@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 19/10/2016 07:45, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > > On 10/19/2016 10:32 AM, Jike Song wrote: > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_group_set_usrdata); >>>> + >>>> +void *vfio_group_get_usrdata(struct vfio_group *group) >>>> +{ >>>> + return group->usrdata; >>>> +} >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_group_get_usrdata); >>>> + >>>> +void *vfio_group_get_usrdata_by_device(struct device *dev) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct vfio_group *vfio_group; >>>> + >>>> + vfio_group = __vfio_group_get_from_iommu(dev->iommu_group); >>> >>> We actually need to use iommu_group_get() here. Kirti adds a >>> vfio_group_get_from_dev() in v9 03/12 that does this properly. >>> >>>> + if (!vfio_group) >>>> + return NULL; >>>> + >>>> + return vfio_group_get_usrdata(vfio_group); > > I am worrying if the kvm instance got from group->usrdata is safe > enough? What happens if you get the instance after kvm released > kvm-vfio device? It shouldn't happen if you use kvm_get_kvm and kvm_put_kvm properly. It is almost okay in the patch, just: > @@ -200,6 +216,8 @@ static int kvm_vfio_set_group(struct kvm_device *dev, long attr, u64 arg) > > kvm_vfio_update_coherency(dev); > > + kvm_put_kvm(dev->kvm); > + > return ret; > } ... please add a new function kvm_vfio_group_clear_kvm(vfio_group) here, that does vfio_group_set_usrdata(vfio_group, NULL) and kvm_put_kvm. This should avoid use-after-free. Paolo