From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D613B9D9B; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781508420; cv=none; b=RrIdDj4P5Ze+79ak8vXJtyf4kg/9AKIHgJAKAHPwBlKCW+JOTrzXmLFH3XBiAM4c4TrUetl1lWwt8+SSFeYu06gcX9rr9FRaeDP+4N2VbC9asv+j+C/bKDke1vlm0Er+Fs4gsXpPi8BRnR34Mz1a3GMiW7WUmFBU2LrvA6qhjRU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781508420; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8JMRxa5Lty8uJvClxnFXKkmrDs6ukAVGg0BRiVu9pQI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jrp2vJ01HkFSeHF2KSVzNHR1sx79LvH/g/by5wtTculFohjAc2D0nA5Wjd0qd0yBE9gEidmkyUtTmVuV3zbO3dXWOVqrKIUF1zn09uNsgXUfxugjRhMo2LF6e57kSAF+r8zeN5QJkzAIszPHiGMMJ8FZpx/vm0iIwuHpmdfGJNU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=IXWbU1jg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="IXWbU1jg" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1781508418; x=1813044418; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8JMRxa5Lty8uJvClxnFXKkmrDs6ukAVGg0BRiVu9pQI=; b=IXWbU1jgmIzwlCVClFH2e1ewEzr03/PhLrNbA/wAlT2Yy0dV6dasV6s0 R4/2Db8VUq4Q4H34bD+/OeGaRVe994Ziq58Q053kpbdKIfplc6zhbUMVC D4g4KHfnmfAeCTW6pjT7ZcfeTnaHhxCyY2iIMG6NJiOJJiu04uw1jsp1Q adIzmzf9rtLihBS3W7DDyY3OSzawfVc43rjY5Qf5zo5WTK5i2p/WH4h86 qaDX0cKEdTJ2kwQD6Q7N+WJoDdufPzEQ1YEZRo4vLxHnx0bBFoR4Skile Q4/Co8ZSs7+Bau5Zg+/HcH/aCGwyWzBYBk+FzyaMW2SmLSrqIv4i3HhjN w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LegXgQIwSwi4ObISV60DNA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Qs1SykAJTa2yfzVXujqjVA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11817"; a="93630142" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,206,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="93630142" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jun 2026 00:26:56 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TFQ3GJUxQp2lTX/9LU4cPw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KKEcSZCdQROyoJMcfv9wSA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,206,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="271086165" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.238.2.24]) ([10.238.2.24]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jun 2026 00:26:50 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:26:47 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/30] KVM: x86: Swap the include order between x86.h and mmu.h To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yosry Ahmed , Kai Huang References: <20260613000329.732085-1-seanjc@google.com> <20260613000329.732085-8-seanjc@google.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Binbin Wu In-Reply-To: <20260613000329.732085-8-seanjc@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/13/2026 8:03 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Invert the include ordering between x86.h and mmu.h, and move > mmu_is_nested() to mmu.h where it belongs (mmu_is_nested()'s placement in > x86.h was solely responsible for the existing ordering), so that x86.h is > not included by most KVM internal headers (but includes them). > > No functional change intended. > > Reviewed-by: Kai Huang > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu