From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, kai.huang@intel.com, ubizjak@gmail.com,
jgross@suse.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pgonda@google.com,
sidtelang@google.com, mizhang@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
manalinandan@google.com, szy0127@sjtu.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86, lib: Add WBNOINVD helper functions
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:16:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f98160b0-4f8b-41ab-b555-8e9de83c8552@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2dce9d8-b79e-7d83-15a5-68889b140229@amd.com>
On 1/22/25 11:39, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> I think you need to do something like.
>>
>> alternative("wbinvd", ".byte 0xf3; wbinvd", X86_FEATURE_WBNOINVD);
> I think "rep; wbinvd" would work as well.
I don't want to bike shed this too much.
But, please, no.
The fact that wbnoinvd can be expressed as "rep; wbinvd" is a
implementation detail. Exposing how it's encoded in the ISA is only
going to add confusion. This:
static __always_inline void wbnoinvd(void)
{
asm volatile(".byte 0xf3,0x0f,0x09\n\t": : :"memory");
}
is perfectly fine and a billion times less confusing than:
asm volatile(".byte 0xf3; wbinvd\n\t": : :"memory");
or
asm volatile("rep; wbinvd\n\t": : :"memory");
It only gets worse if it's mixed in an alternative() with the _actual_
wbinvd.
BTW, I don't think you should be compelled to use alternative() as
opposed to a good old:
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_WBNOINVD))
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-22 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-09 22:55 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: SEV: Prefer WBNOINVD over WBINVD for cache maintenance efficiency Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-09 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86, lib: Add WBNOINVD helper functions Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-09 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: SEV: Prefer WBNOINVD over WBINVD for cache maintenance efficiency Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-10 8:23 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-01-13 18:47 ` Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-14 7:50 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-01-14 16:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-17 22:20 ` Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-13 21:46 ` Mingwei Zhang
2025-01-22 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-22 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86, lib: Add WBNOINVD helper functions Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-22 0:30 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-22 0:30 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-22 1:14 ` Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-22 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: SEV: Prefer WBNOINVD over WBINVD for cache maintenance efficiency Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-22 1:34 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-22 1:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86, lib: Add WBNOINVD helper functions Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-22 7:32 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-01-22 19:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-01-22 23:16 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-01-23 0:06 ` Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-23 0:33 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-23 0:58 ` Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-23 1:17 ` Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-22 1:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: SEV: Prefer WBNOINVD over WBINVD for cache maintenance efficiency Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-23 0:24 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-23 0:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] x86, lib: Add WBNOINVD helper functions Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-23 0:36 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-23 0:55 ` Kevin Loughlin
2025-01-23 0:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: SEV: Prefer WBNOINVD over WBINVD for cache maintenance efficiency Kevin Loughlin
2025-02-26 1:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Kevin Loughlin
2025-02-01 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] x86, lib: Add WBNOINVD helper functions Kevin Loughlin
2025-02-04 16:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-26 1:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-26 14:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-01 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] KVM: SEV: Prefer WBNOINVD over WBINVD for cache maintenance efficiency Kevin Loughlin
2025-02-04 17:00 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-26 1:35 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f98160b0-4f8b-41ab-b555-8e9de83c8552@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kevinloughlin@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manalinandan@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sidtelang@google.com \
--cc=szy0127@sjtu.edu.cn \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox