From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>, Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/19] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:34:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa25f3eb-eb9a-4d83-8fdf-f133c60484da@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231108003135.546002-13-seanjc@google.com>
On 11/8/2023 8:31 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
>
> Extend the PMU counters test to verify KVM emulation of fixed counters in
> addition to general purpose counters. Fixed counters add an extra wrinkle
> in the form of an extra supported bitmask. Thus quoth the SDM:
>
> fixed-function performance counter 'i' is supported if ECX[i] || (EDX[4:0] > i)
>
> Test that KVM handles a counter being available through either method.
>
> Co-developed-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
> Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
> index 6f2d3a64a118..8c934e261f2d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
> @@ -285,13 +285,19 @@ __GUEST_ASSERT(expect_gp ? vector == GP_VECTOR : !vector, \
> expect_gp ? "#GP" : "no fault", msr, vector) \
>
> static void guest_rd_wr_counters(uint32_t base_msr, uint8_t nr_possible_counters,
> - uint8_t nr_counters)
> + uint8_t nr_counters, uint32_t or_mask)
'or_mask' doesn't show a clear meaning, "counters_bitmap" may be a
better name.
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> {
> uint8_t i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_possible_counters; i++) {
> const uint32_t msr = base_msr + i;
> - const bool expect_success = i < nr_counters;
> +
> + /*
> + * Fixed counters are supported if the counter is less than the
> + * number of enumerated contiguous counters *or* the counter is
> + * explicitly enumerated in the supported counters mask.
> + */
> + const bool expect_success = i < nr_counters || (or_mask & BIT(i));
>
> /*
> * KVM drops writes to MSR_P6_PERFCTR[0|1] if the counters are
> @@ -335,7 +341,7 @@ static void guest_test_gp_counters(void)
> else
> base_msr = MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0;
>
> - guest_rd_wr_counters(base_msr, MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS, nr_gp_counters);
> + guest_rd_wr_counters(base_msr, MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS, nr_gp_counters, 0);
> }
>
> static void test_gp_counters(uint8_t pmu_version, uint64_t perf_capabilities,
> @@ -355,9 +361,50 @@ static void test_gp_counters(uint8_t pmu_version, uint64_t perf_capabilities,
> kvm_vm_free(vm);
> }
>
> +static void guest_test_fixed_counters(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t supported_bitmask = 0;
> + uint8_t nr_fixed_counters = 0;
> +
> + /* Fixed counters require Architectural vPMU Version 2+. */
> + if (guest_get_pmu_version() >= 2)
> + nr_fixed_counters = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS);
> +
> + /*
> + * The supported bitmask for fixed counters was introduced in PMU
> + * version 5.
> + */
> + if (guest_get_pmu_version() >= 5)
> + supported_bitmask = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_FIXED_COUNTERS_BITMASK);
> +
> + guest_rd_wr_counters(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0, MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS,
> + nr_fixed_counters, supported_bitmask);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_fixed_counters(uint8_t pmu_version, uint64_t perf_capabilities,
> + uint8_t nr_fixed_counters,
> + uint32_t supported_bitmask)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> +
> + vm = pmu_vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_test_fixed_counters,
> + pmu_version, perf_capabilities);
> +
> + vcpu_set_cpuid_property(vcpu, X86_PROPERTY_PMU_FIXED_COUNTERS_BITMASK,
> + supported_bitmask);
> + vcpu_set_cpuid_property(vcpu, X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS,
> + nr_fixed_counters);
> +
> + run_vcpu(vcpu);
> +
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> +}
> +
> static void test_intel_counters(void)
> {
> uint8_t nr_arch_events = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EBX_BIT_VECTOR_LENGTH);
> + uint8_t nr_fixed_counters = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS);
> uint8_t nr_gp_counters = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS);
> uint8_t pmu_version = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION);
> unsigned int i;
> @@ -427,6 +474,13 @@ static void test_intel_counters(void)
> v, perf_caps[i]);
> for (j = 0; j <= nr_gp_counters; j++)
> test_gp_counters(v, perf_caps[i], j);
> +
> + pr_info("Testing fixed counters, PMU version %u, perf_caps = %lx\n",
> + v, perf_caps[i]);
> + for (j = 0; j <= nr_fixed_counters; j++) {
> + for (k = 0; k <= (BIT(nr_fixed_counters) - 1); k++)
> + test_fixed_counters(v, perf_caps[i], j, k);
> + }
> }
> }
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-09 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-08 0:31 [PATCH v7 00/19] KVM: x86/pmu: selftests: Fixes and new tests Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 01/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Always treat Fixed counters as available when supported Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 02/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Allow programming events that match unsupported arch events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 1:24 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 20:41 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 03/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Remove KVM's enumeration of Intel's architectural encodings Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 16:06 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 19:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 20:38 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 04/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup fixed counters' eventsel during PMU initialization Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 1:28 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 14:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 19:00 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 05/19] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 19:11 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 06/19] KVM: selftests: Drop the "name" param from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE() Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 07/19] KVM: selftests: Extend {kvm,this}_pmu_has() to support fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 08/19] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h and lib/pmu.c for common PMU assets Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 09/19] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:28 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 10/19] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:30 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-09 15:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 11/19] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 12/19] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:34 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2023-11-09 15:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 13/19] KVM: selftests: Add functional test for Intel's fixed PMU counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:39 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 14/19] KVM: selftests: Expand PMU counters test to verify LLC events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:43 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 15/19] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to query if the PMU module param is enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:45 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 16/19] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to read integer module params Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 17/19] KVM: selftests: Query module param to detect FEP in MSR filtering test Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 18/19] KVM: selftests: Move KVM_FEP macro into common library header Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 19/19] KVM: selftests: Test PMC virtualization with forced emulation Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:51 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa25f3eb-eb9a-4d83-8fdf-f133c60484da@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox