public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Sebastian Mitterle <smitterl@redhat.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/2] s390x: firq: floating interrupt test
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 19:23:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa95d6e6-27be-7abf-7b1e-bb6bb9d62214@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203121819.145696b0@p-imbrenda>


>>> +	if (smp_query_num_cpus() < 3) {
>>> +		report_skip("need at least 3 CPUs for this test");
>>> +		goto out;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (stap()) {
>>> +		report_skip("need to start on CPU #0");
>>> +		goto out;
>>> +	}  
>>
>> I think I'd rather turn this into an assert() instead ... no strong opinion 
>> about it, though.
> 
> I agree, including the part about no strong opinions (which is why I
> did not comment on it before)

Would it be the case on any system we might end up running, even under
LPAR ... and whoever could run these tests ?

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * We want CPU #2 to be stopped. This should be the case at this
>>> +	 * point, however, we want to sense if it even exists as well.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	ret = smp_cpu_stop(2);
>>> +	if (ret) {
>>> +		report_skip("CPU #2 not found");  
>>
>> Since you already queried for the availablity of at least 3 CPUs above, I 
>> think you could turn this into a report_fail() instead?
> 
> either that or an assert, but again, no strong opinions
> 

Just because there are >= 3 CPUs doesn't imply that CPU #2 is around.

What we could remove is the "if (smp_query_num_cpus() < 3) {" check, though!

Thanks!

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-03 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-02 12:35 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/2] s390x: firq: floating interrupt test David Hildenbrand
2021-12-02 12:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/2] s390x: make smp_cpu_setup() return 0 on success David Hildenbrand
2021-12-02 12:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/2] s390x: firq: floating interrupt test David Hildenbrand
2021-12-02 12:45   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-12-03 10:55   ` Thomas Huth
2021-12-03 11:18     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-12-03 11:22       ` Thomas Huth
2021-12-03 18:23       ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-12-06  7:12         ` Thomas Huth
2021-12-06  8:15           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-12-06 11:09             ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-12-06 13:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/2] " Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa95d6e6-27be-7abf-7b1e-bb6bb9d62214@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=smitterl@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox