From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
To: guangrong.xiao@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
mtosatti@redhat.com
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>,
yunfangtai@tencent.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] mc146818rtc: drop unnecessary '#ifdef TARGET_I386'
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 19:12:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe0066de-bf05-15ed-cd56-e59cd036563f@amsat.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170510083259.3900-5-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>
On 05/10/2017 05:32 AM, guangrong.xiao@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>
>
> If the code purely depends on LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW, we can simply
> drop '#ifdef TARGET_I386' as only x86 can enable this tick policy
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c | 16 +++-------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
> index 9810bd5..104a26d 100644
> --- a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
> +++ b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ static uint64_t get_guest_rtc_ns(RTCState *s)
> guest_clock - s->last_update + s->offset;
> }
>
> -#ifdef TARGET_I386
> static void rtc_coalesced_timer_update(RTCState *s)
> {
> if (s->irq_coalesced == 0) {
> @@ -126,6 +125,7 @@ static void rtc_coalesced_timer_update(RTCState *s)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef TARGET_I386
> static void rtc_coalesced_timer(void *opaque)
> {
> RTCState *s = opaque;
> @@ -198,7 +198,6 @@ periodic_timer_update(RTCState *s, int64_t current_time, uint32_t old_period)
> assert(lost_clock >= 0);
> }
>
> -#ifdef TARGET_I386
> /*
> * recalculate the coalesced irqs for two reasons:
> * a) the lost_clock is more that a period, i,e. the timer
> @@ -233,9 +232,7 @@ periodic_timer_update(RTCState *s, int64_t current_time, uint32_t old_period)
> s->irq_coalesced, old_period, s->period);
> rtc_coalesced_timer_update(s);
> }
> - } else
> -#endif
> - {
> + } else {
> /*
> * no way to compensate the interrupt if LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW
> * is not used, we should make the time progress anyway.
> @@ -250,9 +247,7 @@ periodic_timer_update(RTCState *s, int64_t current_time, uint32_t old_period)
> RTC_CLOCK_RATE) + 1;
> timer_mod(s->periodic_timer, s->next_periodic_time);
> } else {
> -#ifdef TARGET_I386
> s->irq_coalesced = 0;
> -#endif
> timer_del(s->periodic_timer);
> }
> }
> @@ -841,13 +836,11 @@ static int rtc_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
> }
> }
>
> -#ifdef TARGET_I386
> if (version_id >= 2) {
> if (s->lost_tick_policy == LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW) {
> rtc_coalesced_timer_update(s);
> }
> }
> -#endif
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -904,11 +897,10 @@ static void rtc_notify_clock_reset(Notifier *notifier, void *data)
> rtc_set_date_from_host(ISA_DEVICE(s));
> periodic_timer_update(s, now, 0);
> check_update_timer(s);
> -#ifdef TARGET_I386
> +
> if (s->lost_tick_policy == LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW) {
> rtc_coalesced_timer_update(s);
> }
> -#endif
> }
>
> /* set CMOS shutdown status register (index 0xF) as S3_resume(0xFE)
> @@ -929,12 +921,10 @@ static void rtc_reset(void *opaque)
>
> qemu_irq_lower(s->irq);
>
> -#ifdef TARGET_I386
> if (s->lost_tick_policy == LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW) {
> s->irq_coalesced = 0;
> s->irq_reinject_on_ack_count = 0;
> }
> -#endif
> }
>
> static const MemoryRegionOps cmos_ops = {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-13 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-10 8:32 [PATCH v3 0/5] mc146818rtc: fix Windows VM clock faster guangrong.xiao
2017-05-10 8:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mc146818rtc: update periodic timer only if it is needed guangrong.xiao
2017-05-10 8:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mc146818rtc: precisely count the clock for periodic timer guangrong.xiao
2017-05-10 8:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mc146818rtc: ensure LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW is only enabled on TARGET_I386 guangrong.xiao
2017-05-13 22:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-05-10 8:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mc146818rtc: drop unnecessary '#ifdef TARGET_I386' guangrong.xiao
2017-05-13 22:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2017-05-10 8:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mc146818rtc: embrace all x86 specific code guangrong.xiao
2017-05-10 9:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] mc146818rtc: fix Windows VM clock faster Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-18 2:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-18 7:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-18 13:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2017-05-18 13:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-10 10:04 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe0066de-bf05-15ed-cd56-e59cd036563f@amsat.org \
--to=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@tencent.com \
--cc=yunfangtai@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox