* What io scheduler to use inside guest VM?
@ 2009-03-21 20:53 Piavlo
2009-03-22 0:52 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Piavlo @ 2009-03-21 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
Hi,
I use LVM volumes as guest VM disk.
I'm wondering if setting setting the io scheduler inside linux gest has
any effect (with virtio disk driver and with emulated scsi or ide driver)
And if it has affect what's better choice ? My thoughts is that if
changing the scheduler inside guest has affect - then it's probably
best to use noop scheduler inside the guest
and let the hypervisor linux decide according to it's scheduler.
So what I don't understand is if there are two levels of io scheduling ,
one inside the guest (the redundant one and setting it to noop will
minimize it's affect) and other inside the hypervisor linux?(or just one
level in the hypervisor)
Probably with virtio driver tthere is no io scheduling inside the guest,
but is it so with emulated drivers too?
And also is there any difference in io scheduling if I use image file
instead of LVM?
Thanks a lot
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: What io scheduler to use inside guest VM?
2009-03-21 20:53 What io scheduler to use inside guest VM? Piavlo
@ 2009-03-22 0:52 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2009-03-22 0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
Piavlo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use LVM volumes as guest VM disk.
> I'm wondering if setting setting the io scheduler inside linux gest has
> any effect (with virtio disk driver and with emulated scsi or ide driver)
> And if it has affect what's better choice ? My thoughts is that if
> changing the scheduler inside guest has affect - then it's probably
> best to use noop scheduler inside the guest
There is a recent thread here which I started on just that topic. The only case
in which a guest schedular might have enough information is when a device is
used raw, such as a USB connected device passed to the guest as a USB device.
> and let the hypervisor linux decide according to it's scheduler.
> So what I don't understand is if there are two levels of io scheduling ,
> one inside the guest (the redundant one and setting it to noop will
> minimize it's affect) and other inside the hypervisor linux?(or just one
> level in the hypervisor)
> Probably with virtio driver tthere is no io scheduling inside the guest,
> but is it so with emulated drivers too?
> And also is there any difference in io scheduling if I use image file
> instead of LVM?
>
You should look back at the recent thread, there are some good answers I got,
but after reading them I decided that for file, partition, and LV backed mass
storage, where the host will do ioscheduling the noop is probably best. If an
unshared raw device is being used, it might be better to have the host noop it
and the guest make the decisions, since it has all the information.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-22 0:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-21 20:53 What io scheduler to use inside guest VM? Piavlo
2009-03-22 0:52 ` Bill Davidsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox