From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Duffy Subject: Re: Regarding NAT configuration with KVM Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:17:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4C176D10.2090305@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58110 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932608Ab0FUOUo (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:20:44 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQhrf-0008P4-1m for kvm@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:20:43 +0200 Received: from 143.166.197.6 ([143.166.197.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:20:43 +0200 Received: from charles by 143.166.197.6 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:20:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is the libvirt default network configuration. Please see the libvirt documentation and mailing list for support. As an aside -- you'll probably want to use a bridged configuration rather than the NATted one. If you really do want to stick with the NAT configuration, you'll need to make sure the routing tables on the other hosts guide packets destined for 192.168.122.0/24 back to the VM host.