From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@gmail.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: introduce __vmx_flush_tlb to handle specific vpid
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:12:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpg8u7vkd8k.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: BLU437-SMTP8B9FAE86357F8D7414F0380440@phx.gbl
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> writes:
> Introduce __vmx_flush_tlb() to handle specific vpid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 794c529..7188c5e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -1343,13 +1343,13 @@ static void loaded_vmcs_clear(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs)
> __loaded_vmcs_clear, loaded_vmcs, 1);
> }
>
> -static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_single(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_single(int vpid)
> {
> - if (vmx->vpid == 0)
> + if (vpid == 0)
> return;
>
> if (cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_single())
> - __invvpid(VMX_VPID_EXTENT_SINGLE_CONTEXT, vmx->vpid, 0);
> + __invvpid(VMX_VPID_EXTENT_SINGLE_CONTEXT, vpid, 0);
> }
>
> static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_global(void)
> @@ -1358,10 +1358,10 @@ static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_global(void)
> __invvpid(VMX_VPID_EXTENT_ALL_CONTEXT, 0, 0);
> }
>
> -static inline void vpid_sync_context(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +static inline void vpid_sync_context(int vpid)
> {
> if (cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_single())
> - vpid_sync_vcpu_single(vmx);
> + vpid_sync_vcpu_single(vpid);
> else
> vpid_sync_vcpu_global();
> }
Not sure myself what's the right thing to do but this may be undesirable
in a nested environment. Assuming the processor supports global invalidation
only, this seems like a easy way for the nested guest to invalidate *all*
mappings - even the L1 specific mappings.
> @@ -3450,9 +3450,9 @@ static void exit_lmode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> #endif
>
> -static void vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static inline void __vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vpid)
> {
> - vpid_sync_context(to_vmx(vcpu));
> + vpid_sync_context(vpid);
> if (enable_ept) {
> if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa))
> return;
> @@ -3460,6 +3460,11 @@ static void vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
> }
>
> +static void vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + __vmx_flush_tlb(vcpu, to_vmx(vcpu)->vpid);
> +}
> +
> static void vmx_decache_cr0_guest_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> ulong cr0_guest_owned_bits = vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits;
> @@ -4795,7 +4800,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> vmx_fpu_activate(vcpu);
> update_exception_bitmap(vcpu);
>
> - vpid_sync_context(vmx);
> + vpid_sync_context(vmx->vpid);
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-24 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 10:26 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: introduce __vmx_flush_tlb to handle specific vpid Wanpeng Li
2015-09-24 16:12 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2015-09-25 3:01 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-09-25 8:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpg8u7vkd8k.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=fanwenyi0529@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).