From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bandan Das Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: nVMX: support for MSR loading/storing Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:14:47 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20141209004139.GA8883@gnote> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Wincy Van , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka To: Eugene Korenevsky Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59471 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbaLJJo7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:44:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Eugene Korenevsky's message of "Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:07:45 -0100") Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eugene Korenevsky writes: >> Hi, Eugene, is it okay to split my part up? > > I think the patch is atomic. No ideas how this patch could be split > without breaking its integrity. > You are a co-author of the patch since your ideas make significant part of it. I was suggesting adding the interfaces you introduced in the first patch and then using these interfaces in the second patch to make reviewing easier. It's ok to mention that the second depends on the first. If Wincy has code contributions to the patch, he should sign it off too, else maybe add a Suggested-by to give him credit for his ideas. Also, please include a "v3" in the Subject when you submit your next version.