From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bandan Das Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Expose VMFUNC to the nested hypervisor Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:58:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20170803195443.24911-1-bsd@redhat.com> <03583ab4-49e3-3955-3895-aff54e579d7e@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Hildenbrand Return-path: In-Reply-To: <03583ab4-49e3-3955-3895-aff54e579d7e@redhat.com> (David Hildenbrand's message of "Fri, 4 Aug 2017 17:00:36 +0200") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org David Hildenbrand writes: ... >> v1: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/29/958 >> >> Bandan Das (3): >> KVM: vmx: Enable VMFUNCs >> KVM: nVMX: Enable VMFUNC for the L1 hypervisor >> KVM: nVMX: Emulate EPTP switching for the L1 hypervisor >> >> arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 9 +++ >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand > > (not 100% confident for a r-b, not because of your patches but because > of the involved complexity (flushes, MMU ...)) You and Radim both constitute to major revisions and changes in these patches. I would be 100% confident of a R-b tag by you. Bandan