From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:23:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpgk2hh5h18.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8f198c9-5980-610f-a825-4a28012e4c86@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:12:01 +0200")
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 22/06/2016 18:10, Bandan Das wrote:
>>>> >> + if (!shadow_xonly_valid)
>>>> >> + spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
>>>> >> if (!speculative)
>>>> >> spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;
>>>> >>
>>>> >> @@ -2537,8 +2538,12 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
>>>> >> else
>>>> >> spte |= shadow_nx_mask;
>>>> >>
>>>> >> - if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
>>>> >> - spte |= shadow_user_mask;
>>>> >> + if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK) {
>>>> >> + if (shadow_xonly_valid)
>>>> >> + spte |= PT_PRESENT_MASK;
>>>> >> + else
>>>> >> + spte |= shadow_user_mask;
>>>> >> + }
>>> >
>>> > Can you instead pass VMX_READABLE_MASK to kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes in vmx.c?
>> So, leave spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK as is and make VMX_READABLE_MASK 1ULL if
>> execute only is supported ?
>> And then :
>> if !(pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK) {
>> spte &= ~VMX_READABLE_MASK
>>
>
> No, I meant something like
>
> spte = 0;
> if (!shadow_xonly_valid)
> spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
> ...
> if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
> spte |= shadow_user_mask;
Ok, Xiao mentioned this too. I will fix it in the next version.
Thanks for the review.
> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 3:12 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for EPT execute only for nested hypervisors Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mmu: add a boolean to indicate host ept execute only support Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mmu: Update ept specific valid bit values Bandan Das
2016-06-21 8:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 4:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally Bandan Das
2016-06-21 8:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-21 8:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 16:10 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-22 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 16:23 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2016-06-22 4:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-22 16:21 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] vmx: advertise support for ept execute only Bandan Das
2016-06-22 4:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for EPT execute only for nested hypervisors Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-22 16:34 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-23 5:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-24 2:56 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-24 4:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 4:50 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-24 6:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 7:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-24 16:19 ` Bandan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpgk2hh5h18.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox