From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: remove incorrect vpid check in nested invvpid emulation
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:45:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpgr3jehylb.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448443299-9375-1-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com> (Haozhong Zhang's message of "Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:21:39 +0800")
Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com> writes:
> This patch removes the vpid check when emulating nested invvpid
> instruction of type all-contexts invalidation. The existing code is
> incorrect because:
> (1) According to Intel SDM Vol 3, Section "INVVPID - Invalidate
> Translations Based on VPID", invvpid instruction does not check
> vpid in the invvpid descriptor when its type is all-contexts
> invalidation.
But iirc isn't vpid=0 reserved for root mode ? I think we don't want
L1 hypervisor to be able do a invvpid(0).
> (2) According to the same document, invvpid of type all-contexts
> invalidation does not require there is an active VMCS, so/and
> get_vmcs12() in the existing code may result in a NULL-pointer
> dereference. In practice, it can crash both KVM itself and L1
> hypervisors that use invvpid (e.g. Xen).
If that is the case, then just check if it's null and return without
doing anything.
> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 87acc52..af823a3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -7394,11 +7394,6 @@ static int handle_invvpid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> switch (type) {
> case VMX_VPID_EXTENT_ALL_CONTEXT:
> - if (get_vmcs12(vcpu)->virtual_processor_id == 0) {
> - nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu,
> - VMXERR_INVALID_OPERAND_TO_INVEPT_INVVPID);
> - return 1;
> - }
> __vmx_flush_tlb(vcpu, to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vpid02);
> nested_vmx_succeed(vcpu);
> break;
I also noticed a BUG() here in the default. It might be a good idea to replace
it with a WARN.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-25 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 9:21 [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: remove incorrect vpid check in nested invvpid emulation Haozhong Zhang
2015-11-25 15:45 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2015-11-25 16:18 ` Haozhong Zhang
2015-11-25 16:36 ` Bandan Das
2015-11-25 16:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpgr3jehylb.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=haozhong.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).