From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Dirk Müller" <dmueller@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use WARN_ON_ONCE for missing X86_FEATURE_NRIPS
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:02:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpgy4ffho3v.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151006102329.GC20886@8bytes.org> (Joerg Roedel's message of "Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:23:29 +0200")
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:42:43PM -0400, Bandan Das wrote:
>> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 12:54:43PM -0400, Bandan Das wrote:
>> >> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> writes:
>> >> The problems is that the next_rip field could be stale. If the processor supports
>> >> next_rip, then it will clear it out on the next entry. If it doesn't,
>> >> an old value just sits there (no matter who wrote it) and the problem
>> >> happens when skip_emulated_instruction advances the rip with an incorrect
>> >> value.
>> >
>> > So the right fix would be to just set the guests next_rip to 0 when we
>> > emulate vmrun, just like real hardware does, no?
>>
>> Agreed, resetting to 0 if nrips isn't supported seems right. It would still
>> help having a printk_once in this case IMO :)
>
> I meant to reset it always to 0 on vmrun, like real hardware does.
Atleast the spec don't mention this, I don't know how I got that idea :) The spec
just say that it gets written to by hardware on certain intercepts and for others
it gets reset to 0 on #VMEXIT.
>
>
> Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-06 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-01 11:43 [PATCH] Use WARN_ON_ONCE for missing X86_FEATURE_NRIPS Dirk Müller
2015-10-01 12:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-01 12:45 ` Dirk Müller
2015-10-01 12:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-01 22:31 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-02 6:43 ` Dirk Müller
2015-10-05 1:15 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-05 9:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-05 16:54 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-05 17:15 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-05 17:42 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-06 10:23 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-06 18:02 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2015-10-05 20:12 ` Dirk Müller
2015-10-05 22:00 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-06 10:28 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-06 17:59 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-07 11:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-07 12:47 ` [PATCH] kvm: svm: Only propagate next_rip when guest supports it Joerg Roedel
2015-10-07 12:57 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 15:48 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-07 16:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-07 17:03 ` Dirk Müller
2015-10-07 14:58 ` [PATCH] Use WARN_ON_ONCE for missing X86_FEATURE_NRIPS Bandan Das
2015-10-07 15:24 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpgy4ffho3v.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=dmueller@suse.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).