From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Parag Warudkar Subject: Re: Solaris 10 U2 installation failure Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4597F8DF.6010602@qumranet.com> <4598C3CE.3050802@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Avi Kivity writes: > > Parag Warudkar wrote: > > After letting it run for some time qemu aborted abruptly > > with this on console - > > > > unhandled vm exit: 0x9 > > rax 00000000fec1fc08 rbx 0000000009db01b0 > > rcx 0000000009db019c rdx 0000000009db0000 > > rsi 0000000009db01b0 rdi 0000000000000014 > > rsp 00000000fec1fbc4 rbp 00000000fec1fbc4 > > r8 bff4d48cb7f45a48 r9 4c964fc00d7905c6 > > r10 080491444c9656c8 r11 4c958ae0bff4d4c0 > > r12 b7f447084c965880 r13 0000000100000001 > > r14 0804a08a00000000 r15 0812e36800000000 > BTW, I am not running a 64-bit capable processor. Why is that we are seeing rax/rbx etc. in the register names over here? Or is that some internal KVM naming thingie? Parag ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV