From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2 V7] qemu,qmp: add inject-nmi qmp command Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:01:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4D9CAAF9.7000509@codemonkey.ws> <20110406150818.56707b9b@doriath> <4D9CAE4B.7080305@siemens.com> <20110406160020.373cb5a2@doriath> <4D9CC044.2000705@codemonkey.ws> <4D9E0352.2050204@codemonkey.ws> <20110407185108.GE7100@redhat.com> <20110407191759.GG7100@redhat.com> <4D9E2F6F.3040008@codemonkey.ws> <4DA16FCB.7040509@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Anthony Liguori , Peter Maydell , Lai Jiangshan , Jiangshan , Gleb Natapov , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Blue Swirl , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Luiz Capitulino To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46359 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753764Ab1DKHCN (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 03:02:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4DA16FCB.7040509@redhat.com> (Avi Kivity's message of "Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:52:27 +0300") Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity writes: > On 04/08/2011 12:41 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> And it's a good thing to have, but exposing this as the only API to >> do something as simple as generating a guest crash dump is not the >> friendliest thing in the world to do to users. > > nmi is a fine name for something that corresponds to a real-life nmi > button (often labeled "NMI"). Agree. > generate-crash-dump is a wrong name for something that doesn't > generate a crash dump (the guest may not be configured for it, or it > may fail to work). Or the OS uses the NMI button for something else. > I'd expect that to be host-side functionality.