From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call agenda for July 6th Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:19:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100705110542.5d98c2ee@redhat.com> <4C332EFB.3040606@codemonkey.ws> <4C3331A2.2030400@redhat.com> <4C33354E.7080803@codemonkey.ws> <4C3337FB.5060808@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Anthony Liguori , Chris Wright , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel , Luiz Capitulino To: Kevin Wolf Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35106 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753284Ab0GFPTg (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:19:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C3337FB.5060808@redhat.com> (Kevin Wolf's message of "Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:04:43 +0200") Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Kevin Wolf writes: > Am 06.07.2010 15:53, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> On 07/06/2010 08:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> Am 06.07.2010 15:26, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>> >>>> On 07/05/2010 09:05 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:45:23 +0200 >>>>> Juan Quintela wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> - 0.13 release >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I was hoping to do -rc0 before the holiday but that didn't happen so I'm >>>> working on it now. Figure release is ~1 week from -rc0. >>>> >>> What does this mean for patches that should go into 0.13 and aren't >>> strictly bug fixes? When should the pull request be sent latest? >>> >> >> Last week? > > Sure, but it didn't happen then and things have moved forward. > >> I'd really like to put out -rc0 today and I'm trying to free up time to >> get through the backlog of patches to make that happen. I just pushed >> your latest pull. If you've got another pull request ready send it >> now. But I can't promise that I'll take anything that hasn't already >> shown up. > > I'm just reviewing and merging v2 of Markus' block fixes/cleanups and > I'm considering the Sheepdog block driver (which seems to have had > enough iterations and doesn't touch a single line of code outside its > own file). Any chance to get the next series (Split ide-drive and scsi-disk qdevs, and more) as well? 1-3/8 are bug fixes, and 4/8 removes unreliable information from info block; wanted in .13. 5-8/8 could be punted to .14.