From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.2
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:47:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3vcqsghkv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLH+Afuk-42aPwd9hcvhpmCD88t4-2N02M5oz8LBNZYETA@mail.gmail.com> (Pekka Enberg's message of "Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:56:17 +0200")
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> writes:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>> It's not just the qcow2 implementation or even the block layer. This pull
>> requests adds a userspace TCP/IP stack to the kernel and yet netdev isn't on
>> the CC and there are no Ack's from anyone from the networking stack. I'm
>> fairly sure if they knew what was happening here they would object.
>
> It's something we consider extremely important because it allows easy
> non-root networking. But you're right, we definitely ought to ping the
> networking folks before the next merge window.
The problem is real. The solution "duplicate in user space" sucks. If
you engaging with the kernel networking folks leads to one that doesn't
suck, we should bathe you in free beer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-10 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-04 8:38 [RFC/GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.2 Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 12:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-04 12:35 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-04 13:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 14:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 15:16 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-04 16:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 16:48 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-04 17:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 16:13 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-04 16:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 17:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 13:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-04 14:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-08 14:44 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-11-08 15:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-08 16:00 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-11-10 3:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-11-10 6:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 7:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 8:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 8:23 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 8:28 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 8:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 9:04 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:14 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:34 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:43 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:49 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:50 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 13:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-11-10 13:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 14:47 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2011-11-10 15:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3vcqsghkv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox