From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juan Quintela Subject: KVM call agenda for Mars 21th Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:58:35 +0100 Message-ID: Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25891 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751247Ab1CUNAS (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:00:18 -0400 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Please, send in any agenda items you are interested in covening. - Merge patches speed. I just "feel", that patches are not being handled fast enough, so ... I looked how much patches have been integrated since Mars 1st: (master)$ g log --pretty=fuller ed02c54d1fd5d35c06e62e3dae84ee5bb90097ef.. | grep "^Commit: " | wc -l 121 121 patches total. Now, I looked at how much patches Anthony commited himself: (master)$ g log --pretty=fuller ed02c54d1fd5d35c06e62e3dae84ee5bb90097ef.. | grep "^Commit: " | grep Anthony | wc -l 13 This feel pretty bad, having in account that I have almost 80 patches on the list waiting for action. As it "appears" that more people is also waiting for Anthony to merge things, I think we have a problem here. And no, I don't want to make Anthony feel bad, but I know that the kind of patches that I sent are for subsystems that only he merges. I think that we really have a problem integrating patches, it just takes too long. Thanks, Juan.