From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/16] iommufd/device: Associate KVM file pointer with iommufd_device
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 06:20:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-163681@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008055955.4014342-8-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] iommufd: UAF of kvm_file due to iommufd_device outliving VFIO unbind
--
commit ddde31c06624779bad69fb77ae7b9503b553dacc
Author: Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>
iommufd/device: Associate KVM file pointer with iommufd_device
TSM vDevice support needs access to the KVM associated with a VFIO device
after the device has been bound to iommufd. Extend iommufd_device_bind() to
accept the device's KVM file and store it in the iommufd_device.
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> index a664c70a6fe73..f99f7bee2e774 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -308,7 +309,9 @@ static int iommufd_bind_noiommu(struct iommufd_device *idev)
> * The caller must undo this with iommufd_device_unbind()
> */
> struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device_bind(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
> - struct device *dev, u32 *id)
> + struct device *dev,
> + struct file *kvm_file,
> + u32 *id)
> {
> struct iommufd_device *idev;
> int rc;
> @@ -319,6 +322,8 @@ struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device_bind(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
>
> idev->ictx = ictx;
> idev->dev = dev;
> + /* VFIO holds the file reference while the device is open. */
> + idev->kvm_file = kvm_file;
[Severity: High]
Does this code introduce a use-after-free regression for kvm_file when a
concurrent ioctl is accessing the device?
If an untrusted user thread executes an ioctl that calls iommufd_get_device(),
it will increment idev->obj.users to 2.
If another thread concurrently closes the VFIO device fd, it calls
vfio_df_unbind_iommufd() which leads to iommufd_device_unbind() and then
iommufd_object_destroy_user().
Because users is 2, iommufd_object_remove() will return -EBUSY:
drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:iommufd_object_remove() {
...
if (!refcount_dec_if_one(&obj->users)) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto err_xa;
}
...
}
The unbind operation ignores this error, leaving the idev alive:
drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h:iommufd_object_destroy_user() {
...
ret = iommufd_object_remove(ictx, obj, obj->id, REMOVE_WAIT);
WARN_ON(ret);
}
The VFIO device then drops its KVM reference during the close process, freeing
the kvm_file. When the first thread resumes, will it access the freed kvm_file
stored here?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008055955.4014342-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 5:59 [PATCH v7 00/16] iommufd: vIOMMUs and TSM guest requests for confidential guests Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 01/16] KVM: Introduce file_to_kvm_<arch>() infrastructure Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 02/16] KVM: Add file back-pointer to struct kvm Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 03/16] KVM: x86: Use file_to_kvm_x86() in SEV Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 04/16] KVM/vfio: Use file-based reference counting for KVM Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 05/16] KVM: Restrict kvm_get_kvm/kvm_put_kvm export to internal KVM modules Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 06/16] KVM: Remove unused file_is_kvm Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 07/16] iommufd/device: Associate KVM file pointer with iommufd_device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 08/16] iommufd/viommu: Keep a reference to the KVM file Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 09/16] tsm: Remove the device from lookup before PCI teardown Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 10/16] iommufd: Add the vdevice TSM request ioctl Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 11/16] PCI/TSM: Remove the legacy guest request interface Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 12/16] PCI/TSM: Add vIOMMU-bound contexts for vdevices Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 13/16] iommufd/viommu: Select vIOMMU operations before allocation Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 14/16] iommufd/viommu: Allow PCI TSM backends to provide vIOMMU operations Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 15/16] iommufd: Allow vIOMMUs without a parent HWPT Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 16/16] PCI/TSM: wait for vdevice contexts before removing a DSM Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-08 6:25 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-163681@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox