From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
media-ci@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 14:49:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-169939@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013-fix-p2p-acs-v4-0-v11-10-72cf8c96e617@nvidia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] pci/p2pdma: deadlock in calc_map_type_and_dist() due to non-IRQ-safe xa_store()
--
commit f019da119f00a99a75cbfe2deec0db131a89232d
Author: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking
ACS Translation Blocking rejects upstream Memory Requests with a Translated
address before any peer-routing controls apply, per PCIe r7.0 sec 6.12.1.1.
P2PDMA ignores that bit and can report a route whose ports reject the
Requester's address type.
Add PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_BLOCKED and scan the ports traversed by each route. A
direct route passes only ports below the divergence; a host-bridge route
also passes the common port and its ancestors. Reject the affected class
without falling back to another route, and preserve blocking precedence
over internal-route restrictions.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> index 785e4668a2af5..fc4dea28c8606 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1162,6 +1252,11 @@ calc_map_type_and_dist(struct pci_dev *provider, struct pci_dev *client,
> }
> }
>
> + path.tb_on_path = pci_p2pdma_path_blocks_translation(client, a);
> + if (b_child)
> + path.tb_above_divergence =
> + pci_p2pdma_path_blocks_translation(b_child, NULL);
> +
> /*
> * The walk and the config reads above serve every class; only the
> * decision below depends on the kind of TLP being routed.
[Severity: High]
Does xa_store() use an IRQ-safe lock here?
The calc_map_type_and_dist() function caches routing results by calling
xa_store() later in this function:
xa_store(&p2pdma->map_types, map_types_idx(client),
xa_mk_value(pci_p2pdma_map_types_pack(map_type)),
GFP_ATOMIC);
xa_store() implicitly acquires xa->xa_lock using a plain spin_lock(), which
does not disable hardware or software interrupts.
Since calc_map_type_and_dist() is reachable from process context
(e.g., during target configuration via pci_p2pmem_find_many()), what happens
if a P2PDMA IO mapping request is processed in softirq or hardirq
(e.g., dma_map_sg -> pci_p2pdma_map_type_tlp during an NVMe-oF RDMA
completion) on the same CPU and experiences a cache miss?
It seems it will interrupt the process context, re-enter
calc_map_type_and_dist(), and attempt to acquire the same xa->xa_lock via
xa_store().
Could this result in a hard deadlock since the lock is already held by the
interrupted thread on the same CPU?
Additionally, the XArray appears to be initialized without XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ
in pcim_p2pdma_init():
xa_init(&p2p->map_types);
To safely update the XArray from contexts that include interrupts, should the
driver acquire the lock with IRQs disabled (e.g., using
xa_lock_irqsave(&p2pdma->map_types, flags); __xa_store(...);
xa_unlock_irqrestore(...))?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013-fix-p2p-acs-v4-0-v11-0-72cf8c96e617@nvidia.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 14:25 [PATCH v11 00/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 01/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Honor device-specific ACS redirection Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 02/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Document the TLP attribute assumptions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 03/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 04/19] PCI: Reject unreadable ACS controls in isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 05/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate ACS controls at the path divergence Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 06/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Document directional ACS routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 07/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Collect the path's ACS controls before deciding Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 08/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Answer routing per TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 09/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 10/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 11/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Translated Requests under Direct Translated P2P Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 12/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Log detailed ACS routing diagnostics Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 13/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Add KUnit tests for the ACS routing decisions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 14/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the ACS P2P routing walk Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 15/19] PCI: Add KUnit coverage for ACS isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 16/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Document TLP-class routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 17/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 18/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate the ATS path for clients with ATS enabled Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-13 14:25 ` [PATCH v11 19/19] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the routing of " Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-169939@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox