From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] KVM: x86/xen: Wait out memslot updates in the Xen attribute ioctls
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 21:04:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170507@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013204824.454208-4-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kvm: UAF and lockdep splat in kvm_gpc_check() due to dropped SRCU lock
- [High] kvm: x86/xen: 3-way AB-BA-CA deadlock between srcu, xen_lock, and slots_lock
--
commit 34df3b53ec91de034b47e7637dd9880ba9d6c924
Author: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
KVM: x86/xen: Wait out memslot updates in the Xen attribute ioctls
This patch updates Xen attribute ioctls in KVM to handle memslot updates
by waiting them out (passing wait=true to kvm_gpc_refresh and
kvm_gpc_activate), instead of returning -EFAULT. It also drops the
srcu_read_lock sections around activation calls.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> index fae893cd5762c..76708b8960265 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static bool kvm_xen_hcall_evtchn_send(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 param, u64 *r);
>
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_DEFERRED_FALSE(kvm_xen_enabled, HZ);
>
> -static int kvm_xen_shared_info_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> +static int kvm_xen_shared_info_init(struct kvm *kvm, bool wait)
> {
> struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc = &kvm->arch.xen.shinfo_cache;
> struct pvclock_wall_clock *wc;
> @@ -44,13 +44,12 @@ static int kvm_xen_shared_info_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> u32 wc_version;
> u64 wall_nsec;
> int ret = 0;
> - int idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
>
> read_lock_irq(&gpc->lock);
> while (!kvm_gpc_check(gpc, PAGE_SIZE)) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: High]
Does this code trigger a use-after-free and RCU lockdep splat?
Because the srcu_read_lock() was removed above, this loop calls
kvm_gpc_check() without SRCU protection.
If we look at virt/kvm/pfncache.c:kvm_gpc_check():
bool kvm_gpc_check(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, unsigned long len)
{
struct kvm_memslots *slots = kvm_memslots(gpc->kvm);
...
This dereferences the memslots array and requires SRCU protection. Without it,
a concurrent memslot update can free the memslots structure before
slots->generation is accessed.
[ ... ]
> @@ -792,19 +790,15 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_set_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr *data)
> * to make the call anyway.
> */
> r = kvm->arch.xen.shinfo_cache.active ?
> - kvm_xen_shared_info_init(kvm) : 0;
> + kvm_xen_shared_info_init(kvm, true) : 0;
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock);
> }
> break;
>
> case KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_SHARED_INFO:
> case KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_SHARED_INFO_HVA: {
> - int idx;
> -
> mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock);
>
> - idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> -
> if (data->type == KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_SHARED_INFO) {
> gfn_t gfn = data->u.shared_info.gfn;
>
> @@ -813,7 +807,7 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_set_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr *data)
> r = 0;
> } else {
> r = kvm_gpc_activate(&kvm->arch.xen.shinfo_cache,
> - gfn_to_gpa(gfn), PAGE_SIZE, false);
> + gfn_to_gpa(gfn), PAGE_SIZE, true);
[Severity: High]
Does this code introduce a 3-way AB-BA-CA deadlock between srcu, xen_lock, and
slots_lock?
With wait=true, the thread executes KVM_XEN_HVM_SET_ATTR, acquires xen_lock,
and calls kvm_gpc_activate() which spins in a loop calling cond_resched()
while waiting for a memslot update to complete.
Meanwhile, a concurrent vCPU thread exiting after a WRMSR to the hypercall page
MSR might enter kvm_xen_write_hypercall_page() while holding the srcu lock:
arch/x86/kvm/xen.c:kvm_xen_write_hypercall_page() {
...
mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock);
This vCPU thread blocks waiting for xen_lock, which is held by the ioctl thread
above.
A third thread performing the memslot update (holding slots_lock) calls
synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu), which blocks waiting for the vCPU thread to
release its srcu lock.
This creates an unrecoverable 3-way cycle where the ioctl thread waits for the
memslot update, the memslot update waits for the vCPU thread, and the vCPU
thread waits for the ioctl thread's xen_lock.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013204824.454208-1-dwmw2@infradead.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 20:48 [PATCH 00/10] KVM: x86/xen: Don't drop event deliveries which race memslot updates David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: pfncache: Return -EAGAIN for a lookup which hits an invalid memslot David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: pfncache: Add a 'wait' argument to the refresh and activate functions David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: x86/xen: Wait out memslot updates in the Xen attribute ioctls David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 21:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 21:33 ` David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: x86/xen: Don't lose the timer event when delivery fails transiently David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 21:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: x86/xen: Retry event channel delivery which races a memslot update David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 21:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: x86/xen: Extract delivery of event to vCPU into a separate helper David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: x86/xen: Explicitly tag "shared info" page as never being dirty tracked David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86/xen: Don't dirty track "vCPU info" page David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: x86: Request the guest TLB flush from record_steal_time() David Woodhouse
2026-10-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: selftests: Add Xen evtchn vs memslot-update race test David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170507@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox