From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/15] vfio: Support VFIO devices that access the CPU MMU
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 14:44:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172976@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015142552.4128028-13-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] vfio: NULL pointer dereference in vfio_df_iommufd_bind() via cdev ioctl
- [High] vfio: NULL pointer deref when binding IOMMUFD to CPU_MMU cdev
--
commit 147c0e7516a85b91b63d3c3d8f78088a9ca5c65f
Author: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>
vfio: Support VFIO devices that access the CPU MMU
Support devices that are attached to a CPU and perform DMA through a
MMU without an IOMMU or VFIO container. The VMM uses device-specific
knowledge to handle virtual device creation.
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 423ead48aafe3..41fee81a14cbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD) &&
> + if (type != VFIO_CPU_MMU &&
> + WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD) &&
> (!device->ops->bind_iommufd ||
> !device->ops->unbind_iommufd ||
> !device->ops->attach_ioas ||
> !device->ops->detach_ioas)))
> return -EINVAL;
[Severity: High]
Could this bypass lead to a NULL pointer dereference for users of the
character device interface?
When CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV is enabled, vfio_device_add() automatically
creates a character device node (e.g., /dev/vfio/devices/vfioX) for the
registered device. If an untrusted user opens this cdev file and invokes
the VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD ioctl, the request routes through the
following path:
vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd()
vfio_df_open()
vfio_df_device_first_open()
vfio_df_iommufd_bind()
Inside vfio_df_iommufd_bind() in drivers/vfio/iommufd.c, the code
unconditionally executes:
return vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &df->devid);
Since the updated check permits VFIO_CPU_MMU devices to be registered
without providing a bind_iommufd callback, this would result in an
immediate NULL pointer dereference.
Similarly, calling the VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT ioctl on the cdev
unconditionally dereferences the attach_ioas pointer in
vfio_df_ioctl_attach_pt(), which would also crash the kernel.
Should there be explicit checks in the cdev ioctl handlers to return
-EOPNOTSUPP for devices lacking these callbacks, or should VFIO_CPU_MMU
devices perhaps be excluded from cdev creation entirely?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015142552.4128028-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com?part=12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 14:25 [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] Arm Core Local Accelerator Driver Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] misc/arm-cla: Add driver skeleton and documentation Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/15] misc/arm-cla: Add launch operation helpers Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 16:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-15 16:32 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] dt-bindings: misc: Add Arm Core Local Accelerator Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/15] misc/arm-cla: Probe firmware-described devices Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/15] misc/arm-cla: Initialize devices on CPU bringup Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/15] misc/arm-cla: Accelerator context save and restore Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/15] misc/arm-cla: Set up memory translation context Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/15] misc/arm-cla: Manage domain contexts Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] misc/arm-cla: Add userspace interface Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: arm64: Introduce support to pin VMIDs Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: arm64: Export stage-2 MMU config Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/15] vfio: Support VFIO devices that access the CPU MMU Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-15 16:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/15] misc/arm-cla: Add stage-2 MTC and VM context switch Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/15] misc/arm-cla: Support exclusive context assignment Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/15] misc/arm-cla: Add vfio-mdev user interface Ryan Roberts
2026-10-15 14:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 16:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172976@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox