From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 05/20] ctlv: Prepare message input handling
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:06:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-173035@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015145053.3664509-6-jiri@resnulli.us>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] ctlv: infinite loop in ctlv_attr_next on out-of-bounds error path
--
commit 5ae11d979c8fbb4e21430610d57f8866b9d74025
Author: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
ctlv: Prepare message input handling
This commit introduces wire walking, request indexing, and validated input
accessors for CTLV generated family readers. It keeps CONFIG_CTLV unwired
until module dispatch is complete.
> diff --git a/drivers/ctlv/message.c b/drivers/ctlv/message.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..7e5742ba8f708
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/ctlv/message.c
[ ... ]
> +void ctlv_attr_next(struct ctlv_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + const struct ctlv_message_input_slot *slot;
> + const struct ctlv_message_input_scope *scope;
> + const struct ctlv_node_schema *node;
> + const struct ctlv_attr *next;
> + u32 next_nest;
> + u32 next_offset;
> +
> + slot = ctlv_message_cursor_index(cursor);
> + if (!slot || WARN_ON_ONCE(!cursor->attr))
> + return;
> + next = (const void *)((const u8 *)cursor->attr +
> + ALIGN((size_t)cursor->attr->len, CTLV_ALIGNTO));
> + next_offset = ctlv_message_offset(cursor->msg, next);
> + if (next_offset == slot->end_offset) {
> + cursor->attr = NULL;
> + cursor->index_nest_scope = CTLV_MESSAGE_INPUT_INDEX_NONE;
> + return;
> + }
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(next_offset > slot->end_offset))
> + return;
[Severity: High]
Does this error path fail to invalidate the cursor, leading to an
inescapable infinite loop during attribute iteration?
In ctlv_attr_next(), if the computed next_offset exceeds slot->end_offset,
the function triggers a WARN_ON_ONCE and returns early. Because it returns
without clearing cursor->attr (unlike the successful termination path which
explicitly sets it to NULL), the cursor's state remains exactly as it was.
When using iterator macros like CTLV_IN_FOR_EACH, the loop continues as long
as ctlv_attr_ok() returns true. Since the cursor state is unmodified, it
evaluates as valid, causing the loop to re-process the exact same state and
hit the error path again, resulting in a hard CPU lockup.
Should the error path explicitly set cursor->attr = NULL before returning
to safely terminate the iteration?
> + cursor->attr = next;
> + node = &cursor->tree->node_schemas[cursor->node];
> + if (node->kind == CTLV_SCHEMA_NEST) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015145053.3664509-1-jiri@resnulli.us?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 14:50 [PATCH RFC 00/20] attestation: Add a common subsystem and TDX support Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 01/20] ctlv: Add the schema language and generator Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 02/20] ctlv: Add the UAPI wire format and family API Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 03/20] ctlv: Add the root family specification and generated files Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 04/20] Documentation: ctlv: Add userspace ABI Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 05/20] ctlv: Prepare message input handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 06/20] ctlv: Prepare blob descriptor validation Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 07/20] ctlv: Prepare schema validation Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 08/20] ctlv: Prepare message output handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 09/20] ctlv: Prepare VA blob handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 10/20] ctlv: Prepare event queue support Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 11/20] ctlv: Prepare runtime introspection Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 12/20] ctlv: Add device and operation dispatch Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 13/20] Documentation: ctlv: Describe how to write a family Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 14/20] attestation: Add the base family specification and generated files Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 15/20] attestation: Prepare provider and instance core Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 16/20] attestation: Prepare measurement register journal Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 17/20] attestation: Add CTLV operation handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 18/20] tdx-guest: Expose the native attestation service API Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 19/20] attestation: Add the TDX family specification and generated files Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 20/20] attestation: Add the TDX family implementation Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-173035@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox