From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mina Almasry" <almasrymina@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vfio: selftests: Test BAR write faults after clear_refs
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2026 06:30:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-192290@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101062049.998160-3-almasrymina@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] vfio: selftests: probe pre-faults BAR 0 before clear_soft_dirty_refs()
--
commit 43368d01d06eff4702b5d6cf5af459ab154dd5bc
Author: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
vfio: selftests: Test BAR write faults after clear_refs
This commit adds a regression test in vfio_pci_device_test to verify that
huge_fault on writable MAP_SHARED VFIO PCI BAR mappings handles both
read-then-write and initial direct write faults after soft-dirty tracking
clears VM_SOFTDIRTY via /proc/self/clear_refs.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_device_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_device_test.c
> index 93c11fd5e0818..75ccc557efb92 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_device_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_device_test.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -102,6 +105,86 @@ TEST_F(vfio_pci_device_test, validate_bars)
> }
> }
>
> +static int clear_soft_dirty_refs(void)
> +{
> + ssize_t ret;
> + int fd;
> +
> + fd = open("/proc/self/clear_refs", O_WRONLY);
> + if (fd < 0)
> + return -errno;
> +
> + ret = write(fd, "4\n", 2);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + ret = -errno;
> + else
> + VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(ret, 2);
> +
> + VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(close(fd), 0);
> + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> +}
> +
> +TEST_F(vfio_pci_device_test, bar_write_fault_after_clear_refs)
> +{
> + const u32 rw_mmap_flags = VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_MMAP |
> + VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_READ |
> + VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE;
> + struct vfio_pci_bar *bar;
> + bool tested = false;
> + int ret, i;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + ret = clear_soft_dirty_refs();
> + if (ret == -ENOENT || ret == -EINVAL)
> + SKIP(return, "soft-dirty clear_refs unsupported (%d)\n", ret);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, ret);
> +
> + vfio_pci_cmd_set(self->device, PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> + void *vaddr;
> +
> + bar = &self->device->bars[i];
> + if ((bar->info.flags & rw_mmap_flags) != rw_mmap_flags)
> + continue;
> +
> + ASSERT_NE(NULL, bar->vaddr);
> +
> + /*
> + * clear_soft_dirty_refs() stripped write permissions from
> + * vma->vm_page_prot on the unpopulated BAR mapping created by
> + * vfio_pci_device_init(). Fault it read-only first, then write
> + * to exercise in-place write-upgrade (wp_huge_pmd/wp_huge_pud).
> + */
> + val = READ_ONCE(*(u32 *)bar->vaddr);
> + WRITE_ONCE(*(u32 *)bar->vaddr, val);
[Severity: Medium]
Is bar->vaddr guaranteed to be unpopulated at this point for BAR 0?
During FIXTURE_SETUP(vfio_pci_device_test), vfio_pci_device_init() maps the
BARs and then calls vfio_pci_driver_probe():
tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c:vfio_pci_device_init() {
...
vfio_pci_device_setup(device);
vfio_pci_driver_probe(device);
return device;
}
Several selftest drivers read from BAR 0 during probe:
- dsa_probe() -> dsa_int_handle_request_required() reads
bar0 + IDXD_GENCAP_OFFSET
- ioat_probe() reads device->bars[0].vaddr + IOAT_VER_OFFSET
- nv_falcon_probe() reads bar0 + NV_PMC_BOOT_0
Because those reads happen before clear_soft_dirty_refs() is called,
VM_SOFTDIRTY is still set on the VMA and the fault installs a page table entry
that is already writable.
When clear_soft_dirty_refs() subsequently runs, clear_refs_write() updates
vma->vm_page_prot, but clear_refs_test_walk() skips walking page tables for
VM_PFNMAP VMAs:
fs/proc/task_mmu.c:clear_refs_test_walk() {
...
if (vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP)
return 1;
...
}
As a result, the existing writable page table entry on BAR 0 remains in place,
and the READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() above will not fault or exercise
wp_huge_pmd() / wp_huge_pud() on BAR 0 for those devices.
Should the test replace the VMA with a fresh mmap(MAP_FIXED) and
madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) (or zap the BAR mappings) before the first
clear_soft_dirty_refs() call so that the read-then-write sequence always starts
from an unpopulated mapping?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261101062049.998160-1-almasrymina@google.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 6:20 [PATCH v2 0/2] vfio/pci: fix huge_fault write handling and add selftest Mina Almasry
2026-11-01 6:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/pci: pass FAULT_FLAG_WRITE to vmf_insert_pfn_pmd/pud() Mina Almasry
2026-11-01 6:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vfio: selftests: Test BAR write faults after clear_refs Mina Almasry
2026-11-01 6:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-02 21:45 ` David Matlack
2026-11-03 0:11 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-192290@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox