From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anthony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 06/14] s390/vfio-ap: Transition guest migration state from STOP to STOP_COPY
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 16:18:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-193746@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102151604.2150055-7-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] s390/vfio-ap: use-after-free in vfio_ap_release_mig_file() after device close
- [Critical] s390/vfio-ap: use-after-free of mig_file in vfio_ap_release_mig_file()
--
commit d4f19cfbfd83130bd2529cc5a305e86f834b23bb
Author: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
s390/vfio-ap: Transition guest migration state from STOP to STOP_COPY
This commit implements the migration state transition from
VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP to VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP_COPY by opening an
anonymous file stream for reading the guest's AP configuration.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
> index 8e4e04e039658..48028b12b26f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -143,6 +144,62 @@ static void vfio_ap_release_resuming_file(struct vfio_ap_migration_data *mig_dat
> mig_data->resuming_mig_data_complete = false;
> }
>
> +static ssize_t
> +vfio_ap_stop_copy_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t len,
> + loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_ap_release_mig_file(struct inode *file_inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + struct vfio_ap_migration_file *mig_file = filp->private_data;
> +
> + /*
> + * The mig_file (and by extension mig_file->matrix_mdev) is tied to
> + * migration FD lifetime (see vfio_ap_open_file_stream() function) to
> + * guarantee that the matrix_mdev remains valid for every read/write
> + * operation. Let's drop it here since the migration FD is being
> + * released.
> + */
> + vfio_device_put_registration(&mig_file->matrix_mdev->vdev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations vfio_ap_stop_copy_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .read = vfio_ap_stop_copy_read,
> + .release = vfio_ap_release_mig_file,
> +};
> +
> +static struct file *vfio_ap_open_file_stream(struct vfio_ap_migration_file *mig_file,
> + const struct file_operations *fops,
> + int flags)
> +{
> + struct file *filp;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * Pin the vfio_device registration so that matrix_mdev cannot be freed
> + * while the migration FD is still open. The matching put is in
> + * vfio_ap_release_mig_file().
> + */
> + if (!vfio_device_try_get_registration(&mig_file->matrix_mdev->vdev))
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +
> + filp = anon_inode_getfile("vfio_ap_mig_file", fops, mig_file, flags);
> + if (IS_ERR(filp)) {
> + vfio_device_put_registration(&mig_file->matrix_mdev->vdev);
> + return filp;
> + }
> +
> + stream_open(filp->f_inode, filp);
> +
> + return filp;
> +}
> +
> static struct file *
> vfio_ap_transition_to_state(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
> enum vfio_device_mig_state new_state)
> @@ -156,10 +213,23 @@ vfio_ap_transition_to_state(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
> dev_dbg(matrix_mdev->vdev.dev, "%s: %d -> %d\n", __func__, cur_state,
> new_state);
>
> + /*
> + * Begins the process of saving the vfio device state by creating and
> + * returning a streaming data_fd to be used to read out the internal
> + * state of the vfio-ap device on the source host.
> + */
> if (cur_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP &&
> new_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP_COPY) {
> - /* TODO */
> - return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> + struct vfio_ap_migration_file *mig_file = &mig_data->stop_copy_mig_file;
> + struct file *filp = vfio_ap_open_file_stream(mig_file,
> + &vfio_ap_stop_copy_fops,
> + O_RDONLY);
> + if (IS_ERR(filp))
> + return ERR_CAST(filp);
> +
> + mig_file->filp = filp;
> +
> + return filp;
> }
[Severity: Critical]
Can this trigger a use-after-free of mig_file in vfio_ap_release_mig_file()
(and in vfio_ap_stop_copy_read() in the subsequent patch) if the VFIO device
file descriptor is closed while the migration stream file descriptor remains
open?
In vfio_ap_transition_to_state(), mig_file points to
&mig_data->stop_copy_mig_file, which is embedded inside struct
vfio_ap_migration_data:
struct vfio_ap_migration_data {
enum vfio_device_mig_state mig_state;
bool resuming_mig_data_complete;
struct vfio_ap_migration_file resuming_mig_file;
struct vfio_ap_migration_file stop_copy_mig_file;
};
vfio_ap_open_file_stream() stores mig_file in filp->private_data and calls
vfio_device_try_get_registration(&mig_file->matrix_mdev->vdev). However,
vfio_device_try_get_registration() only pins struct vfio_device (and thus
matrix_mdev) against unregistration; it does not prevent vfio_df_close()
from invoking vfio_ap_mdev_close_device() when the VFIO device FD is closed
(which also happens during normal process exit when close_files() closes the
lower-numbered VFIO device FD before the higher-numbered migration data FD).
When the VFIO device FD is closed, vfio_ap_mdev_close_device() calls
vfio_ap_release_migration_data(), which destroys stop_copy_mig_file.lock and
frees matrix_mdev->mig_data:
void vfio_ap_release_migration_data(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
{
...
vfio_ap_release_mig_files(matrix_mdev);
mutex_destroy(&matrix_mdev->mig_data->stop_copy_mig_file.lock);
mutex_destroy(&matrix_mdev->mig_data->resuming_mig_file.lock);
kfree(matrix_mdev->mig_data);
matrix_mdev->mig_data = NULL;
}
When the migration stream FD is subsequently closed (or read),
vfio_ap_release_mig_file() retrieves mig_file from filp->private_data and
dereferences mig_file->matrix_mdev from the freed mig_data allocation (and
if the VFIO device was reopened in the meantime, a new mig_data is allocated
while the old migration FD still points to the freed mig_data instance).
Should filp->private_data point to matrix_mdev (or should mig_file/mig_data
lifetime be tied to the open migration FDs) so that releasing or reading the
migration FD does not dereference freed memory?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261102151604.2150055-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 15:14 [PATCH v11 00/14] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration support Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 01/14] s390/vfio-ap: Provide function to get the number of queues assigned to mdev Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 02/14] s390/vfio-ap: Data structures for facilitating vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] s390/vfio-ap: Functions to initialize/release vfio device migration data Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 15:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] s390/vfio-ap: Reset migration state in VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl handler Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] s390/vfio-ap: Callback to get/set vfio device mig state during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] s390/vfio-ap: Transition guest migration state from STOP to STOP_COPY Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 16:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to save the vfio device migration state Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 16:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state from STOP to RESUMING Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 16:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to resume the vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 17:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state to from/to STOP Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 17:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] s390/vfio-ap: Callback to get the size of data to be migrated during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] s390/vfio-ap: Set up for vfio-ap device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 17:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] s390/vfio-ap: Add 'migration' feature to sysfs 'features' attribute Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration chapter to vfio-ap.rst Anthony Krowiak
2026-11-02 18:19 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-193746@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox