From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86: move asynchronous page fault handling to vcpu_enter_guest()
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 17:39:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-199646@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105164531.313849-6-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM: x86: stack use-after-free in vcpu_enter_guest() when APF token is 0
--
commit c5a7c8d28f1e59908884ea94549586d942a8b76f
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
KVM: x86: move asynchronous page fault handling to vcpu_enter_guest()
This commit moves host paravirtualized asynchronous page fault handling out
of the MMU page fault paths and into vcpu_enter_guest() using a new
EXIT_FASTPATH_APF fastpath exit completion and a stack-allocated
kvm_task_sleep_node.
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/auqAsEk9o6buPNiR@google.com
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> index 3cb2616d88aca..c01a1cf70d77b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> @@ -163,17 +163,20 @@ bool kvm_can_do_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_handle_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 error_code,
> u64 fault_address, char *insn, int insn_len);
>
> -static inline void kvm_handle_host_apf_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 token)
> +static inline fastpath_t kvm_handle_host_apf_irqoff(struct kvm_task_sleep_node *host_apf_node,
> + u32 token)
> {
> - vcpu->arch.apf.host_apf_flags = kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags();
> - if ((vcpu->arch.apf.host_apf_flags & KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT) &&
> - !kvm_async_pf_queue_task(token, &vcpu->arch.apf.host_apf_node)) {
> - /*
> - * Nothing to do but regular page fault handling must still
> - * be suppressed, so leave host_apf_flags nonzero.
> - */
> - vcpu->arch.apf.host_apf_flags = KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_READY;
> + u32 host_apf_flags = kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags();
> +
> + if (!host_apf_flags)
> + return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
> +
> + if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!(host_apf_flags & KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT))) {
> + kvm_async_pf_queue_task(token, host_apf_node);
> + return EXIT_FASTPATH_APF;
> }
> +
> + return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
> }
>
> void __kvm_mmu_refresh_passthrough_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 2a26900c06bd0..ffcf6ab622518 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -8130,9 +8140,9 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> bool req_int_win =
> dm_request_for_irq_injection(vcpu) &&
> kvm_cpu_accept_dm_intr(vcpu);
> + struct kvm_task_sleep_node host_apf_node = {0};
> fastpath_t exit_fastpath;
> u64 run_flags, debug_ctl;
> -
> bool req_immediate_exit = false;
>
> if (kvm_request_pending(vcpu)) {
> @@ -8507,7 +8517,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> fpu_sync_guest_vmexit_xfd_state();
>
> if (exit_fastpath == EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE)
> - exit_fastpath = kvm_x86_call(handle_exit_irqoff)(vcpu);
> + exit_fastpath = kvm_x86_call(handle_exit_irqoff)(vcpu, &host_apf_node);
>
> if (vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.xfd_err)
> wrmsrq(MSR_IA32_XFD_ERR, 0);
> @@ -8569,6 +8579,9 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (vcpu->arch.apic_attention)
> kvm_lapic_sync_from_vapic(vcpu);
>
> + if (exit_fastpath == EXIT_FASTPATH_APF && host_apf_node.token)
> + kvm_handle_pv_async_pf(&host_apf_node);
[Severity: High]
Can this leave the stack-allocated host_apf_node linked in async_pf_sleepers
after vcpu_enter_guest() returns when token is 0?
In kvm_handle_host_apf_irqoff(), kvm_async_pf_queue_task(token,
host_apf_node) is called without checking whether token is 0 or recording the
boolean return value:
arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c:kvm_async_pf_queue_task() {
...
n->token = token;
n->cpu = smp_processor_id();
init_swait_queue_head(&n->wq);
hlist_add_head(&n->link, &b->list);
raw_spin_unlock(&b->lock);
return true;
}
If token is 0, kvm_async_pf_queue_task() still inserts &host_apf_node.link
into async_pf_sleepers with host_apf_node.token == 0 and returns true.
Then in vcpu_enter_guest(), the condition:
if (exit_fastpath == EXIT_FASTPATH_APF && host_apf_node.token)
kvm_handle_pv_async_pf(&host_apf_node);
evaluates to false because host_apf_node.token is 0, skipping
kvm_handle_pv_async_pf() and returning from vcpu_enter_guest() while
host_apf_node.link remains queued in async_pf_sleepers.
A zero token with KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT set can occur if L0 is buggy
or untrusted, or if L0 KVM sets KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT in L1's
apf_reason.flags via kvm_arch_async_page_not_present() and queues
vcpu->arch.exception_vmexit, but exception_vmexit is subsequently cleared
before injection into L1 (for example, when preempted by KVM_APIC_INIT in
vmx_check_nested_events() or svm_check_nested_events() calling
kvm_clear_exception_queue(), or across KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS and
KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS), leaving KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT stale in L1's
apf_reason.flags until L2 triggers a regular #PF VM-exit whose faulting
address has lower 32 bits equal to 0.
Previously, kvm_handle_host_apf_irqoff() checked the boolean return value of
kvm_async_pf_queue_task() directly instead of testing host_apf_node.token != 0.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261105164531.313849-1-pbonzini@redhat.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 16:45 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: remove the dummy allocation case from async page fault handling Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-05 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: KVM: take b->lock around wait Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-05 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86: register asynchronous page fault waits with interrupts disabled Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-05 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: KVM: remove the dummy allocation case from async page fault handling Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-05 16:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: allow handle_exit_irqoff to return EXIT_FASTPATH_* Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-05 16:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86: move asynchronous page fault handling to vcpu_enter_guest() Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-05 17:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-05 19:08 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-199646@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox